Writes Brian Dunaway:

Lew, I’d lay down a pretty hefty sum that this was even more than a “Freudian Slip.”

(I watched the clip — he clearly says “prostitutor.”)

For one thing, “prostitutor” isn’t a word, not by a long shot. And no one is mangling the word “prosecutor” into the much more difficult to say “prostitutor.”

It is abundantly obvious that it’s a play on words, created specifically for her, given her universally-accepted reputation — despite any “presstitute” pretense to the contrary.

I believe the reason it dropped from his brain onto his mouth is because this is something he calls her behind her back, all the time — and it just slipped out.

He simply has the same opinion of her as everyone else who pretends that she is something she is not, and is not something she is.

And I think that even the dimmest of voters is beginning to see this Potemkin Candidacy for what it is. If not, the following adage will have reached full fruition: “Those who believe in nothing will believe anything.”

https://www.lewrockwell.com/political-theatre/did-tim-walz-just-accidentally-call-kamala-harris-a-prostitute-in-bizarre-michigan-rally/

See this.