The forensic report on the voting system in Antrim County in Michigan is in and it’s public. You may read it all. Below is an excerpt.
If this report is not by itself evidence enough to animate political and judicial responses to rectify the last election, then what is? This is a powerful report. all the evidence should be secured by police authorities, but which ones? Which are reliable and will uphold the rule of law? Which will not bury or lose evidence? Maybe the National Conference of State Legislatures should act.
IMHO. the US Supreme Court should read this and reconsider the case. If I were the plaintiffs, I’d make a motion to reconsider.
There are numerous other possible means to convene bodies that represent the American voting public and which could, on its behalf, move to nullify the election and do it again without the fraud. These potential solutions face political obstacles, not insuperable but large, rooted as they are in deep divisions for which no compromises seem possible. All sides seem to want power to impose their views.
1
“Allied Security Operations Group
Antrim Michigan Forensics Report REVISED PRELIMINARY SUMMARY, v2 Report Date 12/13/2020
Client: Bill Bailey Attorney: Matthew DePerno A. WHO WE ARE
1. My name is Russell James Ramsland, Jr., and I am a resident of Dallas County, Texas. I hold an MBA from Harvard University, and a political science degree from Duke University. I have worked with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), among other organizations, and have run businesses all over the world, many of which are highly technical in nature. I have served on technical government panels. 2. I am part of the management team of Allied Security Operations Group, LLC, (ASOG). ASOG is a group of globally engaged professionals who come from various disciplines to include Department of Defense, Secret Service, Department of Homeland Security, and the Central Intelligence Agency. It provides a range of security services, but has a particular emphasis on cybersecurity, open source investigation and penetration testing of networks. We employ a wide variety of cyber and cyber forensic analysts. We have patents pending in a variety of applications from novel network security applications to SCADA (Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition) protection and safe browsing solutions for the dark and deep web. For this report, I have relied on these experts and resources.
B. PURPOSE AND PRELIMINARY CONCLUSIONS
1. The purpose of this forensic audit is to test the integrity of Dominion Voting System in how it performed in Antrim County, Michigan for the 2020 election. 2. We conclude that the Dominion Voting System is intentionally and purposefully designed with inherent errors to create systemic fraud and influence election results. The system intentionally generates an enormously high number of ballot errors. The electronic ballots are then transferred for adjudication. The intentional errors lead to bulk adjudication of ballots with no oversight, no transparency, and no audit trail. This leads to voter or election fraud. Based on our study, we conclude that The Dominion Voting System should not be used in Michigan. We further conclude that the results of Antrim County should not have been certified”
2 3. “The following is a breakdown of the votes tabulated for the 2020 election in Antrim County, showing different dates for the tabulation of the same votes.
Date Registered Voters Total Votes Cast Biden Trump Third Party Write-In TOTAL VOTES for President
Nov 3 22,082 16,047 7,769 4,509 145 14 12,423 Nov 5 22,082 18,059 7,289 9,783 255 20 17,327 Nov 21 22,082 16,044 5,960 9,748 241 23 15,949 4. The Antrim County Clerk and Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson have stated that the election night error (detailed above by the vote “flip” from Trump to Biden, was the result of human error caused by the failure to update the Mancelona Township tabulator prior to election night for a down ballot race. We disagree and conclude that the vote flip occurred because of machine error built into the voting software designed to create error. 5. Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson’s statement on November 6, 2020 that “[t]the correct results always were and continue to be reflected on the tabulator totals tape . . . .” was false. 6. The allowable election error rate established by the Federal Election Commission guidelines is of 1 in 250,000 ballots (.0008%). We observed an error rate of 68.05%. This demonstrated a significant and fatal error in security and election integrity.”