Comments made by Christine Massey of this interview of David Martin:
David Martin, The Grandmaster of confusion strikes again.
Christine:
How many people over the last few years were clear that whenever David Martin said “coronavirus” he actually meant a non-transmissible protein “sequence”?? Not very many, based on my conversations with people.
David Martin:
“In 2005 it was defined as the creation of a weapon when Ralph Baric said that he actually was using synthetic corona virus…. I’m simply saying, that on the backbone of an architecture of a protein sequence, which is what that definition means…It was distributed.”
Christine:
Where, when, how? Evidence please.
David Martin:
“…we need to use the criminals’ own language to indict them...”
Christine:
No “we” don’t – especially not when we’re not even in court and doing so confuses the hell out of millions of people.
David Martin:
“We have seen throughout the last 3 and a half years nonsense about whether there’s viruses or not viruses, whether there’s this or that. Stop the nonsense!”
Christine:
So David wants us to stop exposing the fact that the entire narrative was 100% b.s. and that there was not transmissible “virus” to quackcinate against or to even test for in the first place.
Stop exposing fake-isolation, fake-sequencing and retarded/useless animal experiments.
Stop exposing the problems with EM imaging.
Stop exposing the utter lack of scientific evidence for contagion and all the failed attempts to demonstrate it.
David Martin:
“if we stop focusing on that, and we start focusing on these nonsensical rabbit trails that have nothing to do with the attack, we would not be giving a Nobel Prize to the manufacturers of a system that actually we know is a pro-oncologic system.”
Christine:
Was this a “Freudian slip” on David’s part? Because it’s true that as we focus on exposing virology and more people catch on, the chance of a Nobel Prize being given to a quackcine loon diminishes.
And since when can people not do both – expose quackcine issues and virology?
MM Comments:
Christine Massey is a heroine of the health freedom movement. She is a former cancer biostatistician who at the start of the Covid Mania began inquiring of health departments around the world:
“Do you have evidence of an isolated virus?”
To date, over 200 institutions from all over the world have responded that they have no evidence of SARS-CoV-2.
Below is the collection of Freedom of Information responses from 217 (and counting) institutions in 40 countries, showing that health/science institutions around the world have no record of the alleged SARS-COV-2 ever being found in and purified from the bodily fluid/tissue/excrement of any sick person, by anyone, anywhere, ever…
…despite this being only the 1st necessary step to show that “it” even exists (followed by sequencing, characterization and controlled experiments to determine causation of illness – aka “science”).
In other words, no one has a sample of “it”, or knows of anyone who does; they have no science, nothing, period.
See HERE
7:19 pm on October 4, 2023
