COVIDCon’s Conundrums

The plandemic raises a multitude of questions. For example, why didn’t the globalists release a really scary pathogen, such as smallpox? Since that contagion kills 30% of its victims, it’s actually lethal, unlike COVID, and far better suited to reducing the population, if that’s the goal.

Why instead did Our Rulers go to all the trouble of manufacturing a hobgoblin from the common cold? OK, yes: the Jab and its profits for Big Pharma. Then, too, perhaps the shamdemic’s perps glory in their plan’s Rube-Goldberg complexity: they may assume it proves their cleverness.

An article Bill Martin sent explores other reasons for COVIDCon’s outline:

…the depopulationists faced the same dichotomy as a virus does: how do you kill a sufficient amount of people without alerting them to the danger quickly enough for them to avoid it?

The vaccines couldn’t inspire an immediate Ebola-like reaction, or no one would permit themselves to be injected. On the other hand, if the vaccines were as harmless as the common cold, they would not serve the depopulationist agenda. …

Instead, … the !vaxx [sic] is designed to reverse the recent advances in life expectancy. This lifespan-reduction approach is also much less disruptive and more efficient than the fertility-targeting approach, because it specifically targets the removal of the least productive and most expensive segment of the population, the elderly.

Lifespan reduction is also less dangerous to the depopulationists, as it’s easier to explain away a general decline in life expectancy than a massive increase in stillbirths and sterility, and perhaps more importantly, avoids infuriating tens of millions of young men and women in their twenties and thirties who are in their physical prime.

Guard Grandma carefully lest her own government slaughter her.

Share

8:25 am on December 30, 2021