Knock, knock.
Who’s there?
Kamala.
Kamala who?
Whoever you need me to be. Cackle cackle.
A mistress to a powerful San Francisco politician twice her age…or a vocal advocate for the “Me Too” movement.
A tough-on-crime prosecutor…or a “Defund the Police” cheerleader.
A likable-enough pragmatist…or “the most liberal nominee in U.S. history.”
A defender of Israel…or a supporter of Hamas terrorists.
A second-generation immigrant proud of her Indian and Jamaican heritage…or a staunch member of the African-American community who affects a southern accent.
Joe Biden’s trusted “border tsar”…or someone who barely knows where America’s borders are.
Whoever Kamala Harris needs to be in order to advance her career prospects, she will do her best to pretend that is who she has always been. Her problem — one she shares with many talentless politicians — is that she lacks both the brainpower and the charisma to convince others that she is more than an uninspiring hack. Usually, such low-caliber politicos peter out in local precincts where could-a-been dreams go to die. Kamala, however, has always had a knack for finding the right VIP to reward her ambition.
Let’s face it, she’s no Bill Clinton. As vile as that perv has always been, Jeffrey Epstein’s favorite houseguest knows how to glad-hand with the best of them. His aw-shucks “I feel your pain” approach to politicking took him far in life. The secret to Slick Willy’s success is that he makes every person he meets feel special. He shares private stories, asks personal questions, and seems genuinely interested in any stranger he meets. That’s high-level tradecraft for a marquee politician.
Bill’s wife, Hillary, has none of his natural instincts. When she tells someone, “I feel your pain,” it’s usually because she’s holding the knife still stuck in that person’s back. Nobody in D.C. trusts the Clintons, but plenty of people like Bill. That’s the difference that put him in the Oval Office and kept her out.
And if Hillary has made it as far as she has only because she hitched her wagon to the right star, Kamala has made it just as far by hitching and re-hitching her wagon from one star to the next whenever it was convenient. She is an unusually empty human vessel who is willing to be whatever those with power need her to be.
In this way, she is entirely different from Hillary. Hillary struggles to accept that her achievements exist only because of Bill and finds it extremely difficult to “do the dance” in front of the right people in order to receive the rewards she feels she inherently deserves. Hildebeest hates socializing with strangers (especially those without money or power) and is always one cocktail away from screeching, “I’m Hillary Rodham, and I should be president, dammit!” Kamala, on the other hand, is willing to dance for just about anybody who can give her a leg up in life. The thought bubble affixed above her head reads, “I will do anything to be president!”
Where Hillary and Kamala overlap, however, is critical: both are obvious fakes. Nobody who witnesses their interactions with others walks away thinking that either is genuine or charming. Nobody feels bigger in their presence. Nobody feels drawn in by their leadership or personal appeal. Hillary and Kamala are mediocre politicians who should have never risen higher than their local school board. They are neither good nor gifted. And their desperation for power reeks.
If Kamala is ultimately successful where Hillary was not — and becomes America’s first female president — it will be because Democrats have perfected their mail-in-ballot operations across the country. In truth, Americans haven’t had honest elections for decades. Without identification requirements in many jurisdictions that first establish whether a person is legally permitted to vote and without transparent procedures for verifying the authenticity of vote tallies, fraud has long been baked into the system. With the transformation of Election Day into Election Season, the opportunities for political operatives to “cook the books” have greatly expanded. With the collapse of in-person voting and the growing incentives for absentee voting, basic safeguards ensuring that real citizens are voting free of duress or reward have largely disappeared. Mail-in-ballot fraud has simply amplified the corruption of an already corrupt system.
