“Disinformation” is a word we hear often today, along with its companion piece, “misinformation.” These are offshoots of “hate speech,” which is also used interchangeably for the same purpose; to censor discouraging words. These Orwellian terms have essentially turned criticism of authority into Thought Crime.
There is a thin line between justifiable criticism and annoying whining. As a Hall of Fame complainer, I know it’s not easy to sense the distinction. But there is virtually nothing or no one with any power in our society today that doesn’t deserve to be criticized. Skewered. Lambasted. And yet, most of the population has been indoctrinated to such an extent that they rise up in defense of the most indefensible individuals and institutions imaginable, whenever a Thought Criminal points out that they aren’t wearing any clothes. In the recent tragedy in North Carolina, where FEMA and law enforcement officials at all levels proved to be such an impediment to relief efforts, sheeple were all over the internet, figuratively yelling, “So you think you could do better?” Well, yes, actually, I do. I think any person not inspired by Satan himself could do better, simply by not stopping rescues and supply deliveries.
Last Rights: The Death...
Best Price: $11.33
Buy New $19.99
(as of 12:14 UTC - Details)
We expect the state controlled media to make excuses for the nonstop corruption, incompetence, and now insanity, that rules our crumbling society. After all, they are paid very well be apologists for it. So it was entirely in character for them to dismiss “baseless conspiracy theories” regarding FEMA and Hurricane Helene. The video reports from people on the scene, who’d been personally impacted, didn’t matter to them. It was all just “disinformation.” The victims of the hurricane were simply lying, or imagining, that government officials were blocking relief efforts. They imagined the National Guard helicopter which hovered low enough in the air to blow away supplies. There is video of that, but it’s still “disinformation.” Videos and eyewitness testimony are irrelevant when the “experts” speak. And the “experts” always find that criticism of authority is, in fact, “disinformation.” Dangerous “disinformation.”
They’ve been at this game for a long time. In the 1950s, they thoroughly demonized Senator Joe McCarthy. His attempt to investigate Soviet infiltration into our government, particularly the Army, was mocked as a “witch hunt.” They hadn’t invented the term “disinformation” yet, and wouldn’t have dared to call it “hate speech.” The American public was still too gullible in that era, but they were rocket scientists compared to the dumbed down sheeple today. As I detail in my new book American Memory Hole, McCarthy had nothing to do with blacklisting, in Hollywood or anywhere else. Hollywood figures were questioned by the House Unamerican Activities Committee. McCarthy served in the Senate. But that doesn’t matter to the court historians, who are the gatekeepers of the past. Everything ever promulgated by the establishment about Joe McCarthy is 100 percent, USDA choice disinformation.
As I’m sure you know, I got started down these rabbit holes by researching the JFK assassination. And quickly discovering that everything said and written by the state controlled media and court historians about the event was 100 percent, USDA choice disinformation. Literally, the only thing they got right was the date and location. Dan Rather, one of my journalistic heroes as a teenager for his tough questioning of Richard Nixon, first burst into prominence as a local CBS reporter in Dallas. “Covering” the assassination in his trademark, “fake news” style. At a time when no one had seen the home movie taken of the assassination by Abraham Zapruder, Rather came on the air and excitedly disclosed that he had, and that the president’s head moved forward dramatically after shots were fired. As anyone who has ever seen the Zapruder film knows, this is a huge lie. JFK’s head in fact moved violently backwards. Violating the laws of physics, as Oswald was supposedly firing from behind.
It isn’t fun being a Thought Criminal. That was especially the case in the late 1970s, when so few of us existed. Fortunately, my wit enabled me to still be a popular party guest, but I knew where to draw the line. As has become painfully apparent to me over the years, I influenced almost no one. One old girlfriend did become a lesbian, as I may have mentioned before. So if I played a hand in that, I guess that’s something. I have stopped discussing Truth in social gatherings. I stopped after my rant about 9/11 really angered some good writer friends. I realized that it was impossible to enlighten them. I recognized this as well while teaching a course on the JFK assassination for my county adult education program. There was always a lone nutter in the bunch, and my impressive Power Point presentation failed to impress them. The old Thomas Gray chestnut comes to mind- where ignorance is bliss, ‘tis folly to be wise.
1984 (Signet Classics)
Best Price: $1.49
Buy New $3.58
(as of 10:53 UTC - Details)
I discovered governmental disinformation everywhere. The RFK and MLK assassinations. The Ruby Ridge tragedy, where the government set up Randy Weaver, a racial separatist- not a “supremacist”- who merely wanted to be left alone with his family in the wilderness. Waco, where government tanks murdered American citizens- in their own home- using a poisonous gas banned by the Geneva Convention for use in warfare. The state controlled media were unanimous in support of serial conspirator Bill Clinton, and smeared any truth about Waco as “conspiracy theory.” It was the 1990s, and we had yet to see the widespread use of the terms “racist,” and certainly not “disinformation.” When the Murrah Building in Oklahoma City blew up, General Ben Partin and others who stated the obvious- that the magic fertilizer bomb couldn’t have done all that damage- were ignored. Timothy McVeigh received a monstrously unfair trial and was executed faster than anyone in Death Row history.
If some of us mention the U.S. Secret Service official memorandum, which describes Clinton White House counsel Vince Foster’s body being found inside his car, that would now be labeled “disinformation.” Foster’s body was officially discovered in Fort Marcy Park, on the ground. Not in his car. So it’s a government memo saying this, not a “conspiracy theory.” Just like the passport of one of the supposed 9/11 hijackers, being found on top of all the pulverized steel and debris, somehow unscathed. They admit that- even bragged about it, so it’s not a “conspiracy theory.” Just like the fact they tell you that the temperature from the magical jet fuel cocktail got up to a certain temperature, which was not nearly as high as their science tells us is necessary for steel to melt. And yet, in the next breath, they’ll insist that it has been “proven” that the fuel melted the beams. That’s 100%, USDA choice disinformation.
