I love women. My head still turns whenever a good looking girl (yeah, I know that’s somehow an offensive term now- add it to my list of Thought Crimes) walks by. That doesn’t happen nearly as much as it used to, given the deteriorating state of so many females in America 2.0. As the probably forbidden old song said- I’m a girl watcher.

So don’t mistake me for a misogynist. I’ve always preferred the company of the fairer sex. They may not generally be as fair as they used to be, but they’re still fairer than us. We can too easily be insensitive, gross, uncouth, unfaithful, and drawn to perversion. Nothing in God’s creation matches the sight of a beautiful female. They are the crown jewel of civilizations. And since I am an unashamedly White man, when I think of this unparalleled beauty, I think primarily of White women. There’s a startling lack of diversity in my mind on this issue. I’m not going to Affirmative Action up my personal tastes, any more than I’d stop liking hamburgers if all the celebrities told me it was racist or transphobic. Huey Long and John F. Kennedy could come back to life and teach a sensitivity course exclusively for me, and I’d still never buy the Michelle Obamas of the world as being beautiful. American Memory Hole: ... Jeffries, Donald Buy New $21.99 (as of 08:43 UTC - Details)

Now the odd thing is that those who would least appreciate my affinity for beautiful White women are….beautiful White women. Well, not all of them, but certainly almost all of them with any kind of public platform. Somehow, they would be “offended” at being called beautiful. I have never known of any man, in the history of the world, who was offended at being called handsome. If some clueless guy smiles at a female colleague and says, “nice butt!,” he would be escorted off the premises in short order. But if any male was told “nice butt!” by any female, that would make his day. His month. Maybe his year. And that encapsulates an essential difference between the sexes. Now, I certainly never said that to any female, even back in the glory days of the 1970s. I know it’s an extreme example. But I think the average male would get in trouble these days in most workplaces for simply attempting small talk.

Men and women, boys and girls, are decidedly different creatures. That’s a biological reality, no matter how many deluded authoritative figures join in the transgender madness. This is real “science” you can trust. Now I do suspect that men who “transition” to women, and fool some lonely co-worker into complimenting them on their “nice butt!” would be far less likely to be offended than if the butt in question was attached to a biological female. I don’t think they can “transition” that kind of ego gratification out of the male gender. Very few males, especially when we are young and full of raging hormones, would ever object to being objectified. So that’s always been a source of contention, to some degree. One gender of young people has sex always on their minds, while the other keeps their guard up. Do young men today even think of sex? They’ve been effectively neutered.

The incels- that tragically growing group of involuntarily celibate males- tell us that 80 percent of the females today want the same 20 percent of the males. What they call the Chads. These desirable Chads are evidently having most of the sex for the entire male population. Now, obviously, a situation where the vast majority of young women have no romantic interest in the vast majority of young men is bound to create huge societal problems. It has already created untold numbers of thirty, forty, and fifty year old male virgins. In my generation, this was really unheard of. Young girls now openly boast of their “body counts.” The number of different guys they’ve slept with. Hey, Mom, Jessica’s body count is only twelve! The same way young guys used to brag (and vastly exaggerate) their own number of female conquests.

If 80 percent of the young girls don’t want 80 percent of the young boys, you end up with the situation we have today. Plummeting birth rates. Plummeting marriage rates. More and more lonely people, especially lonely males. I’m speaking primarily about White people here, because the nonstop propaganda that “built” this has been prepared for, and directed at White females. Go for the “bad boy.” The troublemaker your parents hate. That’s cool. Or hot. Snub the nice boy next door, who literally worships you. That’s boring. No drama there. Must have drama all the time. I need to find myself. I need space. Preferably a space where a Chad resides. Babies are expensive. And hard work. It’s irresponsible. More White people is terrible for the planet. Look at all the animals that need rescuing. Give me a few aloof cats instead.

I’ve talked and written about this extensively. Life imitates art. When art was promoting the idea that men had to be “tough” and self-sufficient, they generally were, or tried to be. When art promoted the notion that every girl should be looking for “husband material,” which usually wasn’t a Chad, almost all of them found husbands. When having families was promoted, White women wanted, and gave birth to as many babies as they could. Adult children didn’t disrespect and/or ignore their older parents. But after decades of television shows and films telling them to, we see the reality today. Parental alienation is all too real. And that message was directed at White females like a laser beam. My mother’s too critical! My father won’t let me have the Black boyfriend Hollywood tells me I need! I want more than this!

This attitude goes back to two of the most devastating cultural products, which both came out in the 1950s. The decade when they invented the teenager. First, J.D. Salinger’s overrated book Catcher in the Rye singlehandedly created teenage angst, which had heretofore been an unrecognized term. Teenage angst didn’t exist in frontier days, for example. While Marlon Brando’s The Wild One first established the anti-hero (in other words, someone who wasn’t heroic, but was promoted as such), it was Rebel Without a Cause that really delivered the message the cultural overlords wanted to convey. The teenagers in that film had kind, loving parents. They weren’t being mistreated. They were “rebelling” for no reason. And who were they rebelling against? Certainly not the government. Big business. The Military Industrial Complex. No, they were rebelling against their parents. Why? Just because.

I don’t know when voting patterns between men and women really changed dramatically, but today they tend to vote very differently. It’s been stated that if you took just the male vote alone, every state in the union would be red. This may or may not be literally true, but certainly if you just took the male vote, even with the influx of millions of illegal immigrants, voting almost 100 percent for Democrats, the Republicans would win virtually every election. The entire “Woke” agenda was developed exclusively for White women. Identity Politics, with its emphasis on emotion, and not reason, was geared to traditional feminine traits. Even though many traditional feminine traits have been thoroughly demonized- the desire to be a mother and homemaker, cooking skills, being a supportive wife, etc.- their innate tenderness has been channeled towards pets, transgenders, and nonwhite people. Hidden History: An Exp... Donald Jeffries Best Price: $9.86 Buy New $14.70 (as of 04:30 UTC - Details)

So White women have been indoctrinated to feel sympathy for “migrants,” and even the most outrageous and aggressive transgenders. And, of course, any and all nonwhites. Remember, a few years ago in Sweden they publicly forgave their migrant rapists. But they have had the empathy drilled out of them when it comes to White males, even close family members. Unless they’re gay. White women treat gay White males with the same love and respect they treat all the nonwhite “marginalized” groups. Shows like Queer Eye for the Straight Guy weren’t written and produced for “queer” audiences. They were designed to attract the attention of White females. Many White women have strangely formed bonds with gay males. Shouldn’t they be looking at them as competition? I guess not, when your expectations are that you “deserve” a Chad, even if you’re tattooed and obese.

There’s an ideological battle going on in most American homes now. Or there was. I think it’s pretty obvious that today’s wives are going to win almost all cultural battles with their continuously slandered, low testosterone mates. And with the advent of the Trumpenstein Project, the battle lines became crystal clear. You were either fer or agin the Giant Orange Man. Period. Since Trumpenstein’s obnoxious personality was scripted to offend today’s easily offended females, they absorbed that message as loudly as they absorbed the one to stop wanting babies. Who knows how many households are split in this way? As the beloved Abraham Lincoln said, a house divided against itself cannot stand. How many American households are not divided against itself? Wives vote Democrat, husbands vote Republican. If you actually believe they’re counting the votes, then you are mindlessly cancelling each other out.

Read the Whole Article