Last night, gunmen with incendiary devices attacked the Crocus City Hall music venue in Krasnagorsk, a Moscow suburb. The death toll stands at around 150 people as I write this, and it will likely rise further, as most of the dead were killed in a fire and a partial roof collapse, and some bodies probably have yet to be recovered. The FSB have arrested eleven people, including four attackers who fled the scene in a white car. Russian authorities have hinted at Ukrainian involvement, while Western sources claim the assault was carried out by Islamic terrorists. For what it’s worth, the Islamic State in Khorasan have claimed responsibility for the attack. Many theories are circulating, but it is too early for me to comment on the plausibility of any of them. Shooter’s Bible ... Manning, Robb Best Price: $11.51 Buy New $16.00 (as of 03:07 UTC - Details)

While the carnage was unfolding, the Ukraine boosters of German Twitter developed two equally uninformed if contradictory themes. The first was that the attack represented a false flag event orchestrated by Vladimir Putin “to boost mobilisation” and justify “more strikes on Ukraine’s civilian population.” This accords with what I propose to call the Eugyppius Law of Breaking News, which predicts that the first wave of popular commentary on any new geopolitical event will always include the thesis that it is in some sense not real. Simultaneously, other stalwart defenders of Western liberal democracy ventured to delight in the slaughter. I am not going to link to any of their statements, but I’ll quote a few to give you an idea. “Let Moscow burn, let all of Moscow burn,” said one prominent German Twitter user about a city with over 12 million residents. “May Moscow sink back into the filthy swamp from which it rose to pollute the world with its foul stench,” said another, smaller account. More moderate and therefore more numerous were sentiments that “Russia should also taste what it is like to live in fear,” because “the people there don’t give a shit about what their mass-murdering leader is doing in Ukraine.”

The black, sulphurous fumes emanating from the Atlanticist, more-weapons-for-Ukraine NAFO corners of Twitter never fail to surprise me. We’re not talking here about the natural emotions one can only expect in warfare, because Germany is not a direct party to any armed conflict. It’s additionally remarkable because the bloodthirsty Germans writing this stuff are not fringe lunatics, but staunch supporters of mainstream politics. Many of them have EU flags in their bios, and when they are not dancing on the graves of their imagined enemies, they often find time to express their passion for all that is liberal, peaceful and democratic. You could be forgiven for wondering if the strong pacifist currents of postwar German culture haven’t bottled up some very dark energies, which since the Russian invasion of Ukraine have finally found a socially acceptable release.

Crimes and Cover-ups i... Jeffries, Donald Best Price: $33.51 Buy New $19.00 (as of 02:22 UTC - Details) I noticed a similar phenomenon during my years as a university professor. Every school I taught at subjected its students to unending rhetoric about the importance of forming a diverse, inclusive and accepting community. All had to be welcome and none could be excluded. This thin facade of universal love and happiness would persist until some minor event provoked the next in a never-ending sequence of hateful campus freakouts. These could be inspired by almost anything – a Halloween costume considered guilty of cultural appropriation, racial graffiti scrawled on a bathroom stall, allegedly insensitive remarks by some professor. Whatever the trigger, all that acceptance and inclusivity would vanish in an instant, as its erstwhile ambassadors indulged in paroxysms of rage and even threats towards these newly available outsiders.

After a while, I realised that this behaviour was an epiphenomenon of the fetish for inclusion. The more self-satisfied virtuous delight you take in extending membership to everybody, the more emotionally necessary it becomes to identify some non-members somewhere. Traditionally, human societies drew clear lines between themselves and outsiders; inclusion and exclusion both had their place and they were both subject to clear rules. In liberal universalist systems that embrace all of humanity, however, exclusion happens sporadically and in uncontrolled ways, generally whenever the harmony and unanimity become unbearable. The tendency of nominally inclusive leftist movements to self-cannibalise in spontaneous purity spirals, the murderous rage that recent demonstrators “against the right” expressed towards phantom “Nazis”, the sudden and quite bizarre eruption of officially sanctioned hatred towards the unvaccinated in 2021, and finally the general popular receptiveness to heedless war-mongering as Ukrainian prospects fade all owe something to this phenomenon.

Read the Whole Article