First, a few details about the new law. Then I’ll deal with the loons and virtue signalers and murder-enablers who pretend they’re saints.
Washington Post (archive.is):
The Bible in 52 Weeks ...
Best Price: $10.93
Buy New $13.22
(as of 11:01 UTC - Details)
Civil rights groups sued Texas on Tuesday over a controversial new law that would allow state and local police to arrest and deport migrants suspected of being in the country illegally, a power that until now has rested solely with the federal government.
The lawsuit filed against Texas sets up a potential showdown between the state and the federal government over who has ultimate authority to protect borders and enforce immigration law. It is a fight that [Governor] Abbott has longed for. The law also gives Texas courts the power to order immigrants suspected of entering the state illegally to return to the country through which they entered.
“Immigration is a quintessentially federal authority,” said the complaint [against Texas] filed in U.S. District Court in Austin by a group of Texas civil and immigrant rights organizations, El Paso County, and the American Civil Liberties Union, arguing that the [Texas] law, known as S.B. 4, violates the supremacy clause of the U.S. Constitution. “A state cannot replace Congress’ immigrant scheme with its own.”
Entering the United States, other than through an approved crossing, is already illegal under federal law and is policed by federal authorities.
But thousands [millions] of migrants have been arriving to seek humanitarian protection or work, and they generally are not prosecuted, especially families. When more people cross the border illegally than federal agencies can process, migrants are often released into the United States to await a far-in-the-future court date.
Number one: Illegal immigration is illegal.
This is no problem for the federal government.
In fact, it’s a giant loophole: “We, the federal government, declare illegal immigration is illegal. But we don’t enforce that law. However, only we can make immigration law.”
Number two: You didn’t really think I was going to drop my exposure of the ACTUAL fentanyl catastrophe, did you?
The feds have remained quiet about it. Meaning they refuse to link it to illegal immigration. They’ll whine about fentanyl, but they’ll never admit it comes into the US through permitting illegal immigration to expand without limit.
Vaccine Free Cap (Embr...
Buy New $24.95
(as of 11:01 UTC - Details)
So here, for the second time, is my analysis of the fentanyl situation.
As you read it (and ready yourself to spread the information far and wide), keep in mind that the weight of just seven grains of salt is a lethal dose of the drug.
—I’m waiting to hear some lard-ass sociologist or some vegan software engineer say:
“But you see, Jon, if you do a real analysis of the fentanyl numbers and deploy a MODEL, and rational ALGORITHMS, and make a reasonable PROJECTION…
“You’ll see your estimate of 6 billion potential deaths from fentanyl is a massive overreach. We’re actually talking about no more than 600 million deaths…”
“And depending on which model you use, on the low end we could be looking at a 365 million number…”
“And then there is the question of how many years it would take for 600 million or 365 million people to ingest lethal doses of the drug…”
“So the die-off could take, say, as long as a decade…”
“And that estimate would require a different model…”
Yeah. I’m sure this reaction from “the professional community” will be forthcoming.
