I picked up the idea for this, my first original narrative kicking off this substack project, from a recent substack post in Bailiwick News. This site is compiled and authored by Katherine Watt. I was introduced to the work of Katherine Watt through the many rich substack contributions of her close colleague, Sasha Latypova. Ms. Latypova is the creator of Due Diligence and Art.
Watt’s essay explained Senator Rand Paul’s proposed amendment to drop the Emergency Measures provision that became law a week after the events of Sept. 11, 2001. Eighty-six of the 100 Senators in the US Congress voted down Paul’s effort to discontinue Public Law 107-40 twenty-two years after it was invoked. The post-9/11 law “authorized the use of the United States Armed Forces against those responsible for the recent attacks launched against the United States.”
As Watt sees it, the blank cheque given by the Congress to the US Armed Forces and its Commander-In-Chief helped push along the agenda the put in 2019 the Department of Defence in charge of the war against humanity that is still underway. The main weapon so far in this war is a military device still speciously presented to the public as pharmaceutical vaccines promoted as a remedy for COVID-19.
Public Law 107-40 was pushed on the public on September of 2001 without any systematic investigation whatsoever of the crime scene and the range of possible culprits that might have had a hand in the debacle. The leap to take action in 2001 before proper investigations could take place was re-enacted in the COVID-19 Hoax.
Within a few days of 9/11 the US Armed Forces touched down in Afghanistan where it went to war primarily to implement regime change. Then in 2020-21 a supposed remedy was rushed into production and then jabbed into the arms of many billions of humans. These experimental jabs were pushed into blood veins before proper tests had taken place and without the application of quality controls.
This approach of taking action first and leaving investigations to later, is apparently becoming an essential aspect of the new normal. Even in the increasingly dysfunctional criminal justice system, where the core legal principle has required the presumption of innocence until guilt is proven, the old rules seem not to apply . Usually this provision is invoked only to provide further protections to the powerful to make them even more invulnerable to the recriminations of whistle blowers, investigative journalists and such.
9/11 used as a Trojan Horse for Control Junkies Seeking to Further Entrench Their Own Power and Wealth
The official story providing cover for the US-Israeli false flag operation known as 9/11 is composed of outrageous lies and deceptions every bit as obvious to genuine truth-seekers as the complex of COVID scams facilitating the massive power grab presently underway. The misrepresented events of the 9/11 fiasco ushered in an elaborate continuing complex of “emergency measures” designed to concentrate arbitrary executive authority while sidelining the rule of law, constitutional protections, checks and balances etc etc etc. Hence the 9/11 scam has a huge part in laying the psychological and pseudo-law foundations of our current dilemma explored in some detail by those who regularly gather here.
While the exploitation of Emergency Measures provisions to advance power grabs and dubious policy objectives is nothing new in history, the public hysteria generated especially by the pulverization of the three World Trade Center Towers in Manhattan opened the door to new frontiers skulduggery. The prevailing sense of panic and insecurity was quickly harnessed to justify police state activity plus the virtual declaration of martial law.
The speed of the government’s transitions to a war-time footing in 2001 was remarkable. These transitions include the near-instant US invasion of Afghanistan, the fast release and ratification of the massive Patriot Act, and the speedy re-engineering of airports to advertise the transformation of rights-bearing citizens into terror suspects. All these examples are highly suggestive of insider preparation for the events of 9/11 before they actually took place. The evidence points to prior knowledge and preparation by the real instigators of 9/11 in much the same fashion that Event 201 in October of 2019 signalled the identity of the pivotal organizers responsible for the false flag pandemic to come.
The fact that the US Senate is still unwilling to suspend the first Emergency Measure of 9/11 is instructive. Beginning in early 2020, the resort to the pseudo-laws enacted by Emergency Measures is still operative in many countries and at the different levels of jurisdiction these countries contain. Especially with the mandating of the military countermeasures disguised as vaccines, the Emergency Measures approach was absorbed into the governance of, for instance, hospitals, schools, corporations, trade unions, professional associations, and such.
The Pharmaceutical industry claimed the indemnifications flowing from the Emergency Use Authorizations adopted by the governments of most of the world’s countries. In Canada Prime Minister Justin Trudeau invoked the Canadian version of martial law with his government’s invocation of yet another Emergency Act. Trudeau used his new powers to order Canadian banks to seize the accounts of his most effective political opposition, namely members and supporters of the Truckers Freedom Convoy movement.
