House Committee on Oversight and Accountability Chairman James Comer issued a Congressional subpoena Wednesday, demanding that the FBI produce an unclassified record, saying it alleges a criminal scheme involving the then-Vice President and a foreign national.
The subpoena was issued after a whistleblower made legally protected disclosures to Senator Chuck Grassley’s office. According to the whistleblower, the document is an FBI-generated FD-1023 form and it details an arrangement involving an exchange of money for policy decisions. The subpoena to FBI Director Chris Wray demands all FD-1023s containing the word “Biden” and all accompanying attachments and documents.
Republicans on the House Oversight Committee have been investigating the Biden Crime Family’s shady business schemes to determine if family members – including the President – have been compromised by foreign actors, and if there is a national security threat. The Oversight Committee has obtained thousands of pages of financial records related to the Biden family’s business transactions and recently discovered a deal that resulted in several members of the Biden family – 12 and counting – and their companies receiving over $1 million in more than 15 incremental payments from a Chinese company through a third party.
Comer added, “The information provided by a whistleblower raises concerns that then-Vice President Biden allegedly engaged in a bribery scheme with a foreign national. The American people need to know if President Biden sold out the United States of America to make money for himself. Senator Grassley and I will seek the truth to ensure accountability for the American people.”
In a letter to Wray and Attorney General Merrick Garland, Grassley wrote: “It has been alleged that the document includes a precise description of how the alleged criminal scheme was employed as well as its purpose…The DOJ and the FBI appear to have valuable, verifiable information that you have failed to disclose to the American people. Therefore, Congress will proceed to conduct an independent and objective review of this matter, free from those agencies’ influence.”
In testimony last February before the House Judiciary Committee’s first hearing on the Weaponization of the Federal Government, Grassley detailed how political bias was infecting high-level investigative decisions at the FBI, including investigations related to the Biden family’s foreign business arrangements and bank records.
The whistleblower – who fears for his life – claims there is a document at the FBI that details a bribery scheme with more than one foreign nation, in which then-Vice President Joe Biden was paid to deliver certain US Government policy outcomes.
If this documented evidence definitively proves that Joe Biden sold out American policy in exchange for these bribes, this is the end of the Biden Presidency, because it would mean that not only is he compromised but that he has actively worked against the United States on behalf of foreign nations for money.
Rep Marjorie Taylor Greene was on the War Room with guest host, Natalie Winters and had this to say.
Meanwhile, a pair of Russiagate all-stars, former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper and former CIA Director John Brennan will testify before the House Weaponization Committee this month over signing the infamous 2020 letter in which former intelligence officials claimed the Hunter Biden laptop was an instrument of Kremlin disinformation.
Clapper and Brennan will sit for transcribed interviews after House Republicans revealed Secretary of State Antony Blinken was behind the operation to discredit the laptop. Brennan will testify next week on May 11 and Clapper will appear before lawmakers on May 17, according to a source familiar with arrangements.
Yesterday, Just The News released a rare and candid email exchange between two former CIA bosses, Michael Morell and John Brennan that provides damning new proof that the now-infamous intelligence letter signed by 51 retired officials was in fact a political effort by U.S. spies instigated and assisted by Biden’s campaign in an effort to influence the 2020 election.
In the October 2020 email, Morell told John Brennan that he was organizing this letter, claiming that the Hunter Biden laptop was a Russian influence operation because he wanted to give Joe Biden’s campaign a “talking point” during the last presidential debate with Donald Trump during the 2020 election.
This letter was portrayed by news media, fact checkers and Big Tech as an independent and organic initiative by security experts but in fact, it was a pre-meditated and admitted lie to the American people designed to hide the truth and to throw the 2020 election.
Remember, millions of Americans were censored and de-platformed by Twitter and Facebook simply for referring to Hunter Biden’s laptop.
Last week, Morell testified to Jim Jordan’s House Judiciary Committee that a conversation he had with current Secretary of State Antony Blinken, then a Biden campaign adviser, “triggered” his effort to organize the letter, that his intention was to help Biden win the election and that the Biden campaign provided assistance spreading the letter to news media.
Blinken has since tried to minimize his role in the letter, insisting it wasn’t his idea. He is now being asked to turn over his communication records in a separate matter related to Hunter Biden and his shady business engagements by May 15th.
In their letter to Blinken, Senators Ron Johnson and Chuck Grassley document a series of emails revealing how Blinken seemingly lied under oath about his prior communications with Hunter. While testifying before Congress on Dec. 22, 2020, Blinken was asked if he had any means of correspondence —including phone calls, emails, or texts — with Hunter Biden during his time as President Barack Obama’s deputy secretary of state, to which Blinken replied, “No.”
Emails from Hunter’s laptop appear to contradict Blinken’s December 2020 testimony. As documented in the Johnson-Grassley letter, Hunter emailed Blinken at his personal email address on May 22, 2015, asking if the then-deputy secretary of state was available to meet so he could get the deputy secretary of state’s “advice” on some things.
Emails from the infamous abandoned laptop that Blinken sought to discredit show that Hunter has ties to Blinken and his wife, Evan Ryan dating back over a decade, having scheduled meetings with him while he was on the board of Burisma and Blinken was deputy secretary of state.
The Johnson-Grassley letter also raises questions regarding Blinken’s knowledge of Hunter’s role as a Burisma Holdings board member. Burisma Holdings is a Ukrainian gas company that paid Hunter $50,000 a month despite the President’s son having no prior energy experience.
Despite Blinken claiming to have no knowledge of Hunter’s Burisma ties during his December 2020 testimony, emails from Hunter’s laptop reveal that Blinken’s wife, Evan Ryan, “corresponded directly with Hunter Biden (from her personal email address) in an apparent attempt to connect [Blinken] with representatives of Burisma’s US lobbying firm, Blue Star Strategies,” according to State Department documents obtained during their inquiry.
The Johnson-Grassley letter tells Blinken, “It seems highly unlikely that you had no idea of Hunter Biden’s association with Burisma while your wife was apparently coordinating with Hunter Biden to potentially connect you with Burisma’s US representatives. Because your testimony is inaccurate, Congress and the public must rely on your records as the source for information about your dealings with Hunter Biden.”
A charging decision is near in the Hunter Biden investigation led by US Attorney David Weiss of Delaware, sources told The Washington Post.
No, they’re not deciding on whether they’ll indict him for facilitating his father’s treasonous selling-out of the American People that benefited at least 12 members of the Biden Crime Family. They are near final decisions on gun and tax crimes, in an ongoing investigation that has spanned two presidential administrations and lasted for over four years.
The news comes one week after Biden’s lawyers reportedly met with prosecutors to get an update on the case, although Newsmax legal analysis Alan Dershowitz said that meeting “probably” was for negotiations between Biden lawyers and prosecutors before a charging decision is made.
Word of a charging decision comes after “FBI investigators reportedly expressed ‘growing frustration’ over the pace of the inquiry, and an IRS whistleblower came forward to allege Hunter has received ‘preferential treatment’ under the auspices of Attorney General Merrick Garland.’”
The House Ways and Means Committee granted two attorneys representing the IRS whistleblower authority to inspect Hunter Biden’s tax returns and related information. This development promises to accelerate the unraveling of the Justice Department’s Biden family protection racket.
IRS privacy law is also delaying and complicating matters and the clock on the statute of limitations for some charges but the whistleblower has detailed, “examples of preferential treatment and politics improperly infecting decisions and protocols that would normally be followed by career law enforcement professionals in similar circumstances if the subject were not politically connected.” People directly familiar with the case stated that specific DOJ employees placed strictures on questions, witnesses and tactics investigators may be allowed to pursue that could impact President Biden. The unnamed sources also stressed the improper politicization of the case came from the Justice Department and FBI headquarters.
The whistleblower’s accusations thus extend far beyond the tax case against Hunter Biden. Although unraveling the scandal will start there, hopefully, it won’t end there. With the whistleblower’s attorneys now able to coordinate directly with the House Ways and Means Committee, the timeframe for exposing those complicit in covering for the Bidens just became shorter.
In yet another horrifying example of our two-tiered “Just Us” system, a federal jury yesterday found four members of the Proud Boys guilty of seditious conspiracy and other charges in the Justice Department’s most high-profile trial related to the events of January 6, 2021. After six days of deliberation, jurors convicted Enrique Tarrio, Ethan Nordean, Joseph Biggs, and Zachary Rehl of seditious conspiracy and conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding.
Defense attorney Roger Roots, representing J6 political prisoner Dominic Pezzolla spoke with The Gateway Pundit Thursday, saying “Tarrio was not even in DC! Look at Pezolla, he had only been a Proud Boy for 30 days,” Roots lamented. “They convicted everyone on the breaking of the fence, including Tarrio — are you kidding me breaking the fence from 50 miles away?”
Tarrio, the Proud Boys’ national leader, was arrested on January 4 after burning a Black Lives Matter flag and was not in the District of Columbia during the protest that escalated into the infamous riot. Biggs, Nordean and Rehl gathered at the Washington Monument, and stopped at the food trucks before marching to the Capitol Building. They entered the building for mere minutes and never committed an act of violence.
All text and online communications exchanged amongst the defendants on January 6, which were exhibited during discovery, confirm they primarily conspired to return to their hotel rooms, attend a concert and safely return home to their young children following the protest.
While the government embedded the Proud Boys with Confidential Human Sources for months and years leading up to January 6th, the undercover federal agents failed to mitigate the so-called “insurrection.”
Roots says, “There is no evidence of a seditious plot of any kind. The evidence that the government put on is a bunch of Tweets and Telegram chats about things leading up to J6 that were completely taken out of context. The vast majority of Telegram chats that are violent talk were about preparing for Antifa on the street and things that have nothing to do with the US Capitol.”
In other news, the US Navy brought a drag queen, who is an active duty sailor, into a “digital ambassador” program aimed at targeting a wider array of potential recruits through digital platforms like Instagram, a spokesperson told the Daily Caller News Foundation.
The Navy is seeking different ways of reaching younger recruits as it faces a historic recruiting crisis. Spokesmen for the US Navy say that “An effort is being made to connect recruiting to the interests and concerns of Gen-Z.”
Sure. We’re on the brink of nuclear war. That’ll help!
Former Pfizer Vice President, Michael Yeadon recently made a video urging people to stand up against the global COVID psychological operation. Despite the WHO’s recent claims that the “pandemic emergency” that never was is now “officially” over, we are still in the midst of this operation. They have simply dialed down the panic telegraphing until their next power grab.
Dr Yeadon’s message perfectly links the COVID PSYOP with the market crash PSYOP and the Climate Change PSYOP, as well as the various other PSYOPs in place. Time is running out, but Dr Yeadon ends by correctly stating that we must all “withdraw our consent,” which is another way of saying Do NOT comply.
The Deep State Dems driving the Biden Regime have destroyed our legal system, destroyed our economy, destroyed our currency, destroyed our health, destroyed our military – and now, they want to “finish the job”.
But there’s some good news, too. The World Health Organization has declared an end to the COVID pandemic, which coincides with the the US Government’s lifting of vaccine mandates for federal workers and travelers to the US (unless you’re an illegal migrant, of course) and the resignation of CDC Director Rochelle Walensky!
On her Substack, pharma analyst, Sasha Latypova writes:
Rochelle Walensky, a co-conspirator behind the deployment of bio-chemical weapons on the Americans and global populations has resigned from the CDC.
According to a complaint filed by Lisa McGee at Vaxxchoice, Walensky was never properly sworn in when appointed to her office, and her signed affidavit stated that she was NOT a Director of CDC but a Senior Advisor. I don’t know if her resignation is related to this, but one can hope it is!
Reprinted with the author’s permission.
