Heard of anyone being lynched lately?

Neither have I.

Lynching, even if it is not explicitly called lynching, is illegal in every state. For example, in the South Carolina Code of Laws, in Title 16, “Crimes and Offenses,” in chapter 3, “Offenses Against the Person,” under article 3, “Lynching,” in section 16-3-210, “Assault and battery by mob; investigation and apprehension; civil liability,” it says:

(A) For purposes of this section, a “mob” is defined as the assemblage of two or more persons, without color or authority of law, for the premeditated purpose and with the premeditated intent of committing an act of violence upon the person of another. The Light of Truth: Wr... Wells, Ida B. Best Price: $7.62 Buy New $12.69 (as of 06:31 UTC - Details)

(B) Any act of violence inflicted by a mob upon the body of another person, which results in the death of the person, shall constitute the felony crime of assault and battery by mob in the first degree and, upon conviction, an offender shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than thirty years.

(C) Any act of violence inflicted by a mob upon the body of another person, which results in serious bodily injury to the person, shall constitute the felony crime of assault and battery by mob in the second degree and, upon conviction, an offender shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than three years nor more than twenty-five years.

(D) Any act of violence inflicted by a mob upon the body of another person, which results in bodily injury to the person, shall constitute the misdemeanor crime of assault and battery by mob in the third degree and, upon conviction, an offender shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than one year.

So why bring it up?

Two bills in the 116^th Congress that would have made lynching a federal offense died at the end of the congressional term.

The Justice for Victims of Lynching Act of 2019 (S.488) passed without amendment in the Senate by voice vote on February 14, 2019. A companion bill in the House (H.R.3536) was never voted on.

The Emmett Till Antilynching Act (H.R.35) passed without amendment in the House by a vote of 410-4 on February 26, 2020. The four representatives who voted against the bill were Justin Amash (I-MI), Louie Gohmert (R-TX), Thomas Massie (R-KY), and Ted Yoho (R-FL). Ten Democrats and six Republicans did not vote on the bill.

Neither bill was voted on in the other chamber.

The relevant text of these bills reads the same:

SEC. 3. Lynching. Coatesville and the Ly... Hyser, Raymond M. Best Price: $14.98 Buy New $17.00 (as of 04:07 UTC - Details)

(a) Offense.—Chapter 13 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:

§ 250. Lynching

Whoever conspires with another person to violate section 245, 247, or 249 of this title or section 901 of the Civil Rights Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 3631) shall be punished in the same manner as a completed violation of such section, except that if the maximum term of imprisonment for such completed violation is less than 10 years, the person may be imprisoned for not more than 10 years.

But if lynching is already a crime in every state, then why was Congress even considering making lynching a federal offense?

Rep. Bobby Rush (D-IL), who sponsored the legislation, said the bill will “send a strong message that violence, and race-based violence in particular, has no place in American society.”

Speaking on the House floor prior to the vote on the measure, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said: “Today Congress has an opportunity to acknowledge its responsibility for its historic failure to confront and end the horror of lynching in America.” But since when was it the responsibility of Congress to “confront and end the horror of lynching in America”?

Rep. Ted Yoho told CNN that he voted against the measure because the bill is an “overreach of the federal government” and “tramples on state’s rights.” Wow. That is not something you hear very often from members of Congress—even Republican ones.

Voting on a lynching bill is just political grandstanding. It is also a way to force white Republican members of Congress to prove that they are not racists, even though Democrats will still say that they are racists if they vote to cut one penny from welfare or increase work requirements for food stamp eligibility.

So why didn’t the Emmett Till Antilynching Act pass in the Senate?

Blame the heroic Rand Paul.

He held up the bill in the Senate, telling reporters at the Capitol: “We think that lynching is an awful thing that should be roundly condemned, that should be universally condemned.” But he also explained that the bill might “conflate lesser crimes with lynching,” which he said would be a “disservice to those who were lynched in our history” and result in “a new 10-year penalty for people who have minor bruising.” “We don’t think that’s appropriate,” said Sen. Paul, “and someone has to read these bills and make sure they do what they say they’re going to do rather than it be just a big PR effort, and then everybody gets up in arms and wants to beat up anybody who wants to read the bill, and actually make the bill strong.”

In an attempt to make a bad law better, he introduced an amendment to the bill that “would apply the criminal penalties for lynching only and not for other crimes.”

Senators Cory Booker (D-NJ) and Kamala Harris (D-CA) were furious with Paul. “There’s no reason for this, there’s no reason for this,” said Harris, repeating herself. “I am so raw today,” said Booker, whatever that means.

Is lynching bad? Of course it is. Is lynching horrible? Absolutely. Is lynching a grave injustice? Certainly it is. But lynching should not be a federal crime any more than shoplifting, burglary, or trespassing should be federal crimes. It cannot be made so without lynching the Constitution.

The Best of Laurence M. Vance