Are Guns the Problem?
by
Walter E. Williams
Recently
by Walter E. Williams: Dishonest
Educators
When I attended
primary and secondary school – during the 1940s and '50s – one didn't
hear of the kind of shooting mayhem that's become routine today.
Why? It surely wasn't because of strict firearm laws. My replica
of the 1902 Sears mail-order catalog shows 35 pages of firearm advertisements.
People just sent in their money, and a firearm was shipped.
Dr. John Lott,
author of More
Guns, Less Crime, reports that until the 1960s, some New
York City public high schools had shooting clubs where students
competed in citywide shooting contests for university scholarships.
They carried their rifles to school on the subways and, upon arrival,
turned them over to their homeroom teacher or the gym coach and
retrieved their rifles after school for target practice. Virginia's
rural areas had a long tradition of high-school students going hunting
in the morning before school and sometimes storing their rifles
in the trunks of their cars that were parked on school grounds.
Often a youngster's 12th or 14th birthday present was a shiny new
.22-caliber rifle, given to him by his father.
Today's level
of civility can't match yesteryear's. Many of today's youngsters
begin the school day passing through metal detectors. Guards patrol
school hallways, and police cars patrol outside. Despite these measures,
assaults, knifings and shootings occur. According to the National
Center for Education Statistics, in 2010 there were 828,000 nonfatal
criminal incidents in schools. There were 470,000 thefts and 359,000
violent attacks, of which 91,400 were serious. In the same year,
145,100 public-school teachers were physically attacked, and 276,700
were threatened.
What explains
today's behavior versus yesteryear's? For well over a half-century,
the nation's liberals and progressives – along with the education
establishment, pseudo-intellectuals and the courts – have waged
war on traditions, customs and moral values. These people taught
their vision, that there are no moral absolutes, to our young people.
To them, what's moral or immoral is a matter of convenience, personal
opinion or a consensus.
During the
'50s and '60s, the education establishment launched its agenda to
undermine lessons children learned from their parents and the church
with fads such as "values clarification." So-called sex education
classes are simply indoctrination that sought to undermine family
and church strictures against premarital sex. Lessons of abstinence
were ridiculed and considered passé and replaced with lessons
about condoms, birth control pills and abortions. Further undermining
of parental authority came with legal and extralegal measures to
assist teenage abortions with neither parental knowledge nor consent.
Customs,
traditions, moral values and rules of etiquette, not laws and government
regulations, are what make for a civilized society. These behavioral
norms – transmitted by example, word of mouth and religious teachings
– represent a body of wisdom distilled through ages of experience,
trial and error, and looking at what works. The importance of customs,
traditions and moral values as a means of regulating behavior is
that people behave themselves even if nobody's watching. Police
and laws can never replace these restraints on personal conduct
so as to produce a civilized society. At best, the police and criminal
justice system are the last desperate line of defense for a civilized
society. The more uncivilized we become the more laws that are needed
to regulate behavior.
Many customs,
traditions and moral values have been discarded without an appreciation
for the role they played in creating a civilized society, and now
we're paying the price. What's worse is that instead of a return
to what worked, people want to replace what worked with what sounds
good, such as zero-tolerance policies in which bringing a water
pistol, drawing a picture of a pistol, or pointing a finger and
shouting "bang-bang" produces a school suspension or arrest. Seeing
as we've decided that we should rely on gun laws to control behavior,
what should be done to regulate clubs and hammers? After all, FBI
crime statistics show that more people are murdered by clubs and
hammers than rifles and shotguns.
January
15, 2013
Walter
E. Williams is the John M. Olin distinguished professor of economics
at George Mason University, and a nationally syndicated columnist.
To find out more about Walter E. Williams and read features by other
Creators Syndicate columnists and cartoonists, visit the Creators
Syndicate web page.
Copyright
© 2013 Creators Syndicate, Inc.
The
Best of Walter E. Williams
|