Real Reason for Prosecutions of Bodog.com and Megaupload?
by Anthony Wile
The Daily Bell
Recently
by Anthony Wile: The
World the Elites Remade?
With the attacks
on Internet websites Megaupload and Bodog we find what we call the
Internet Reformation is providing us with a good look at the evolving
face of Western-style civil and criminal justice.
Kim Dotcom,
the founder of Megaupload, a file-sharing facility, and Calvin Ayre,
the founder of 'Net gambling operation Bodog, have both been indicted
by US federal prosecutors.
There are other
prosecutions on the way, apparently, that are even more tenuous
than the ones leveled at Megaupload and Bodog. But no doubt they
will be pushed forward as well.
The attack
on Bodog is sad for me personally as I know Calvin Ayre and have
admired him as a courageous entrepreneur someone who has
created new business models using the power of the 'Net.
Sure, his businesses
involved gaming and sports contests but he didn't coerce anyone
into participating. He offered a service as a technology
pioneer and people spent their money willingly. This is not
the mark of a criminal enterprise. And yet US officials want to
arrest him.
We've predicted
this for a long time, here at the Daily Bell. As the Internet Reformation
gathers force (as it is, in my opinion), those who oppose it and
want to sustain the status quo are using increasingly obvious methods
of repression.
They are being
forced to show their collective hand, in other words, because technology
is overwhelming their previous methodologies of control. One of
the basic methods of control has to do with what we call elite dominant
social themes, the fear-based promotions that frighten people into
giving up wealth and power to global enterprises.
But these promotions
are seemingly foundering now as the Internet exposes them one by
one. Global warming, the European Union, central banking, mass vaccination
campaigns, "Peak Oil," electric cars one by one
the themes and sub themes of the power elite have come under serious
attack.
The result
has been a forcible return to authoritarianism. If people cannot
be scared into willingly complying with a New World Order, then
they will be FORCED into compliance.
This is just
what happened after the Gutenberg Press began to have an impact
in Europe. People began to find out the way THEIR world Really Worked
and the result was the emergent Renaissance.
Now, people
can make the argument that the Renaissance and the Gutenberg Press
were two entirely distinct and separate evolutions but I would argue
that to view them discretely is a mistake.
There may have
been certain evolutions leading to the Renaissance that were not
directly involved with the dissemination of mass-produced information
but obviously, the one was influenced by the other. The result was
two-fold. People became aware, increasingly, of their manipulation,
and the power elite of the day uncomfortable with this growing
knowledge base struck back as best it could.
Two of the
tools that the elites used at the time were wars and legal maneuvers.
There were so many wars, in fact, that eventually the Treaty of
Westphalia was convened to try to stop them.
At the same
time, the doctrine of copyright was developed and propagated. Copyright,
especially, was intended to stop the free-flow of information and
to make both books and periodicals more expensive and thus less
apt to be purchased by the "masses."
Now, granted,
this is a particular point of view. Another one is that the past
1,000 years have simply marked the ascension of one ethnic type
at the expense of others the Dark Forces, so to speak, at
the expense of the Good.
But that seems
a bit simplistic to me blaming one group alone for history's
complexity and leaving aside other equally important forces. To
be clear: It seems the Gutenberg Press threatened the elites of
the day, and, partially anyway, they responded as best they could.
The Reformation
and Glorious Revolution did not arise in a vacuum. No matter how
manipulated they were initially by a power elite desperate to retain
its influence, the ramifications ultimately seem to have outrun
the intentions of the founders.
In other words,
once launched, these socio-political occurrences had ramifications
far beyond what was perhaps planned. And in my view they were likely
launched to help blunt the impacts of the Gutenberg Press itself.
We can arrive
at this conclusion simply by asking if those who may have been behind
the Reformation intended that the schism create the New World (and
eventually the United States) with a thousand thriving, separate
sects.
The answer
is, of course, no. The elites did not foresee all that came from
their maneuverings nor do they ever.
It may be argued
that they are "in charge." But anyone following what has
occurred in the past ten years would have to come to a different
conclusion. There are distinctly "reactive" elements involved.
Anyone with an open mind can see them.
As it is today,
so it likely was then. Whatever the reasons for the Reformation
and events like the Glorious Revolution, one can see from today's
vantage point that they were probably a reaction, at least in part,
to the advent of increasingly available information via books and
periodicals, courtesy of the Gutenberg Press.
And the reaction
is continuing. Watch as the Motion Picture Association of America,
having successfully targeted Megaupload, is now taking aim at a
company called Hotfile. In fact, the MPAA has filed a lawsuit against
Hotfile and recently filed for summary judgment as well. Here's
how Techdirt described the argument:
The more
you read, the more you shake your head. The MPAA's circular arguments
can basically be summarized as "We shall prove that this
tool is illegal. Exhibit A: People use this illegal tool."
Very large segments of the motion are basically this tautology
over and over again. "Oh my goodness, this is illegal, and
our proof is that it's designed so people use it!"
For example,
the motion focuses on Hotfile's affiliate program for uploaders,
which is quite similar to Megaupload's. However, the MPAA interprets
this in a bizarre way suggesting that it was designed to encourage
infringement. Why? Because it was designed to encourage usage.
Really. The affiliate program pays people more if more of their
content is downloaded. According to the MPAA that alone is evidence
of encouraging infringement.
That seems
crazy. As we pointed out, plenty of artists used such services
themselves to distribute their own works free to consumers, while
still getting paid for it at the same time. This is a business
model that cuts out the legacy gatekeepers ... but does that make
it against the law? In the eyes of the MPAA, absolutely.
It is this
sort of abuse of power and legal authority that marks the second
stage of the elites' battle against the Internet Reformation. But
history tells us that this stage, generally, was not especially
successful.
It might, in
fact, be compared to the migration of Protestant sects to the New
World to escape prejudice and oppression. Migration need not be
merely physical; it can be electronic, too. ABC News tells us that
after the "take down [of] Megaupload, other file sharing sites
will look for countries where they can base their websites and remain
safely exempt from U.S. prosecution. A new file sharing site titled
Anonyupload.com is purportedly based in Russia and the Ukraine.
It is soliciting donations to buy servers and other equipment."
I don't know
what will happen to my friend Calvin but I do know that what he's
done is NOT illegal in many countries and that his business continues
to operate outside the US as do others of the same kind.
Such actions
are surely not winning the US any friends and may eventually cause
a backlash. That's something the MPAA ought to be worried about,
even if it isn't.
It took the
elites a number of centuries to control the damage done by the Gutenberg
Press. These massive technological changes are not merely dealt
with by flicking a "kill switch."
The Internet,
as we often point out, is a process not an episode. Many of its
ramifications are yet to unfold. Simply making up new criminal law
and trying to arrest people will not likely stem the tide, or not
in the short run.
In the long
run, technology will evolve along with "law." The idea
that the elites can simply shut down the free-flow of information
now that they've put their collective mind to it is doubtful, from
my point of view, and perhaps even simplistic.
So what's the
"real reason" for this outright attack on business and
entrepreneurial freedom? The elites want to control information
and make sure that gambling, which is a most prosperous business,
is kept as much as possible under government purview.
The power elite
isn't using legal force on a whim. I would argue the escalations
they have made recently provide us with insights into their collective
psyche. And I would argue what we can see there is ... fear.
Reprinted
with permission from The
Daily Bell.
March
12, 2012
Anthony
Wile is an author, columnist, media commentator and entrepreneur
focused on developing projects that promote the general advancement
of free-market thinking concepts. He is the chief editor of the
popular free-market oriented news site, TheDailyBell.com.
Mr. Wile is the Executive Director of The Foundation for the Advancement
of Free-Market Thinking – a non-profit Liechtenstein-based foundation.
His most popular book, High
Alert, is now in its third edition and available in several
languages. Other notable books written by Mr. Wile include The
Liberation of Flockhead (2002) and The Value of Gold (2002).
Copyright
© 2012 The
Daily Bell
The
Best of Anthony Wile
|