The Fight Against the Total Surveillance State in Our Schools
by John W. Whitehead
Recently
by John W. Whitehead: Obama’s
First-Term Track Record on Civil Liberties
The battle
playing out in San Antonio, Texas, over one students refusal
to comply with a public school campaign to microchip students has
nothing to do with security concerns and even less to do with academic
priorities. What is driving this particular program, which requires
students to carry smart identification cards embedded
with Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) tracking devices, is
money, pure and simple or to put it more bluntly, this program
is yet another example of the nefarious collusion between government
bureaucracy and corporate America, a way for government officials
to dance to the tune of the corporate state, while unhesitatingly
selling students to the highest bidder.
Oblivious to
the impact on students fundamental rights, school officials
with the Northside Independent School District (NISD) in San Antonio,
Texas, have embarked upon a crusade to foist ID badges embedded
with RFID tags on about 4,200 students at Jay High School and Jones
Middle School. These tags produce a radio signal that is tied to
the students Social Security numbers, allowing the wearers
precise movements to be constantly monitored. Although the school
district already boasts 290 surveillance cameras, the cards which
the students are required to wear will make it possible for school
officials to track students whereabouts at all times. Teachers
are even requiring students to wear the IDs when they want to use
the bathroom. NISD officials plan to eventually expand the $500,000
program to the districts 112 schools, with a student population
of 100,000.
Hoping to achieve
full student compliance with the profit-driven Student Locator Project,
school officials have actually gone so far as to offer gift cards,
pizza parties and raffle prizes to classes with the highest ID badge
participation rates. By any other name, you would call this bribery.
No such rewards, however, await the students like 15-year-old Andrea
Hernandez who resist the program on principle. Since voicing her
objection to the program on religious grounds, Andrea has been stigmatized,
penalized and discriminated against. Those who, like Andrea Hernandez,
refuse to wear the SmartID badge will also be forced to stand in
separate lunch lines, denied participation in student government
and activities, and prohibited from making certain commercial exchanges
at school.
School officials
at Jay High School reportedly offered to quietly remove the tracking
chip from Andrea Hernandezs card if the sophomore would agree
to wear the new ID, stop criticizing the program and publicly support
the initiative. Andrea refused on principle, because she believes
wearing the chipless Student Locator ID badge would signal that
she endorses a program that not only violates her conscience but
also runs afoul of her constitutional rights. As a result, Andrea
now faces expulsion for refusing to participate in the schools
money-making scheme.
Just to be
clear, these tracking devices are not being employed to prevent
students from cutting classes or foster better academics. Its
a money game. Using the devices to account for the students
whereabouts on campus, whether in class or not, school administrators
can count students as being in school and
thereby qualify for up to $1.7 million in funding from the state
government. As Pascual Gonzalez, Northsides communications
director, explains, The revenues that are generated by locating
kids who are not in their chairs to answer present,
but are in the building in the counselors office, in
the cafeteria, in the hallway, in the gym if we can show
they were, in fact, in school, then we can count them present.
While this
Student Locator program is not yet widespread, its only a
matter of time before we see more students facing the same struggle.
Other student tracking programs are currently being tested in Baltimore,
Anaheim, Houston, and the Palos Heights School District near Chicago.
Some cities already have fully implemented programs, including Houston,
Texas, which began using RFID chips to track students as early as
2004. Preschoolers in Richmond, Calif., have been tagged with RFID
chips since 2010.
Unfortunately,
while parents and students have fought back in some instances, they
have yet to discourage the financial interest of the security industrial
complex, which has set its sights on the schools as a vast,
rich market a $20 billion market, no less just
waiting to be conquered. Indeed, corporations stand to make a great
deal of money if RFID tracking becomes the norm across the country.
A variety of companies, including AIM Truancy Solutions, ID Card
Group and DataCard, already market and sell RFID trackers to school
districts throughout the country, and with big names such as AT&T
and IBM entering the market, the pressure on school districts to
adopt these systems and ensure compliance will only increase.
RFID is only
one aspect of what is an emerging industry in tracking, spying,
and identification devices. For example, schools in Pinellas County,
Fla., now use palm reading devices to allow children to purchase
lunch. The reader takes an infrared picture of the palms vein
structure, and then matches that information with the childs
identity. 50,000 students in the county are using the readers, and
another 60,000 are expected to soon join the program. Palm scanning
identification devices are spreading to hospitals and schools across
the country, and can be found in over 50 school systems and 160
hospital systems, spanning 15 states and Washington, DC.
We are generally
taught to fear the stock images of tyranny: the jackboots in marching
formation, the jail cell door, the batons cracking down on innocent
skulls. Yet while we should be vigilant against these injustices,
most are wholly unaware of the invasive technologies which are slowly
spreading across America: the tyranny of radio waves and Wi-Fi signals,
infrared cameras, biometric scanners and GPS tracking devices, among
many others.
These tendrils
of the corporate surveillance-state are slowly coming to control
all our daily interactions, and our nations public schools
are merely the forefront of a movement to completely automate all
human interaction and ensure that no one is able to escape the prying
eyes of government officials and their corporate partners.
December
4, 2012
Constitutional
attorney and author John W. Whitehead [send
him mail] is founder and president of The
Rutherford Institute. He is the author of The
Change Manifesto (Sourcebooks).
Copyright
© 2012 The Rutherford Institute
The
Best of John W. Whitehead
|