Thank
You for Your Service?
by
Laurence
M. Vance
Recently
by Laurence M. Vance: The
Warmonger’s Lexicon
It is without
question that Americans are in love with the military. Even worse,
though, is that their love is unqualified, unconditional, unrelenting,
and unending.
I have seen
signs praising the troops in front of all manner of businesses,
including self-storage units, bike shops, and dog grooming.
Many businesses
offer discounts to military personnel not available to doctors,
nurses, and others who save lives instead of destroy them.
Special preference
is usually given to veterans seeking employment, and not just for
government jobs.
Many churches
not only recognize veterans and active-duty military on the Sunday
before holidays, they have special military appreciation days as
well.
Even many of
those who oppose an interventionist U.S. foreign policy and do not
support foreign wars hold the military in high esteem.
All of these
things are true no matter which country the military bombs, invades,
or occupies. They are true no matter why the military does these
things. They are true no matter what happens while the military
does these things. They are true no matter which political party
is in power.
The love affair
that Americans have with the military – the reverence, the idolatry,
the adoration, yea, the worship – was never on display like it was
at the post office the other day.
While at the
counter shipping some packages, a U.S. soldier, clearly of Vietnamese
origin in name and appearance, dressed in his fatigues, was shipping
something at the counter next to me. The postal clerk was beaming
when he told the soldier how his daughter had been an MP in Iraq.
Three times in as many minutes I heard the clerk tell the soldier
– with a gleam in his eye and a solemn look on his face – "Thank
you for your service." The clerk even shook the soldier’s hand
before he left.
I could not
believe what I was seeing and hearing, and I am no stranger to accounts
of military fetishes in action.
Aside from
me not thanking that soldier for his service – verbally or otherwise
– I immediately thought of four things.
One, what service
did this soldier actually render to the United States? If merely
drawing a paycheck from the government is rendering service, then
we ought to thank every government bureaucrat for his service, including
TSA goons.
Did this soldier actually do anything to defend the United States,
secure its borders, guard its shores, patrol its coasts, or enforce
a no-fly zone over U.S. skies? How can someone blindly say "thank
you for your service" when he doesn’t know what service was
rendered?
Two, is there
anything that U.S. soldiers could do to bring the military into
disfavor? I can’t think of anything. Atrocities are dismissed as
collateral damage in a moment of passion in the heat of battle by
just a few bad apples. Unjust wars, we are told, are solely the
fault of politicians not the soldiers that do the actual fighting.
Paul Tibbets and his crew are seen as heroes for dropping an atomic
bomb on Hiroshima. Before he died, Tibbets
even said that he had no second thoughts and would do it again.
I suspect that if the United States dropped an atomic bomb tomorrow
on Afghanistan and Pakistan, killing everyone and everything, and
declaring the war on terror over and won, a majority of Americans
would applaud the Air Force crew that dropped the bomb and give
them a ticker-tape parade.
Three, why
is it that Americans only thank American military personnel for
their service? Shouldn’t foreign military personnel be thanked for
service to their country? What American military worshippers really
believe is that foreign military personnel should only be thanked
for service to their government when their government acts in the
interests of the United States. Foreign soldiers are looked upon
as heroic if they refuse to obey a military order to shoot or kill
at the behest of their government as long as such an order is seen
as not in the interests of the United States. U.S. soldiers, however,
are always expected to obey orders, even if it means going to Iraq,
Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen, or Libya under false pretenses.
And four, what
is a Vietnamese man – who most certainly has relatives, or friends
or neighbors of relatives, that were killed or injured by U.S. bombs
and bullets during the Vietnam War – doing joining the U.S. military
where he can be sent to shoot and bomb foreigners like the U.S.
military did to his people?
And aside from
these four things, I’m afraid I must also say: Sorry, soldiers,
I don’t thank you for your service.
- I don’t
thank you for your service in fighting foreign wars.
- I don’t
thank you for your service in fighting without a congressional
declaration of war.
- I don’t
thank you for your service in bombing and destroying Iraq and
Afghanistan.
- I don’t
thank you for your service in killing hundreds of thousands of
Iraqis and Afghans.
- I don’t
thank you for your service in expanding the war on terror to Pakistan
and Yemen.
- I don’t
thank you for your service in occupying over 150 countries around
the world.
- I don’t
thank you for your service in garrisoning the planet with over
1,000 military bases.
- I don’t
thank you for your service in defending our freedoms when you
do nothing of the kind.
- I don’t
thank you for your service as part of the president’s personal
attack force to bomb, invade, occupy, and otherwise bring death
and destruction to any country he deems necessary.
Thank you for
your service? I don’t think so.
July
19, 2011
Laurence
M. Vance [send him mail]
writes from central Florida. He is the author of Christianity
and War and Other Essays Against the Warfare State, The
Revolution that Wasn't, and Rethinking
the Good War. His latest book is The
Quatercentenary of the King James Bible. Visit his
website.
Copyright
© 2011 by LewRockwell.com. Permission to reprint in whole or in
part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.
The
Best of Laurence M. Vance
|