Will a Decline in Table Manners Lead to a Rise in Murder? No: But
It's Not (Quite) as Ridiculous as You Might Think
by
Tom Chivers
Daily Telegraph
We're losing
our table manners, apparently. A
study of the nation's eating habits finds that Britons no longer
worry about eating with their mouth closed, putting the knife
and fork together when finished, or most damning of all
keeping their elbows off the table. I know, I can hardly credit
it myself.
Whatever the
merits of the study it's carried out "on behalf of Birmingham
Food Fest", and has the distinct whiff of PR nonsense about
it there's something interesting here. What on earth is the
point in keeping your elbows off the table? It's not as if you're
digging them into your neighbour's ribs: it is, apparently, an entirely
arbitrary convention. Who decided that this inoffensive and comfortable
posture is "wrong"?
Steven Pinker,
in his fantastic and important book The
Better Angels Of Our Nature, found himself wondering something
similar, about what I can only assume is the North America-specific
commandment of not using your knife to steer food onto your fork:
For as long
as I have known how to eat with utensils, I have struggled with
the rule of table manners that says that you may not guide food
onto your fork with your knife. To be sure, I have the dexterity
to capture chunks of food that have enough mass to stay put as
I scoot my fork under them. But my feeble cerebellum is no match
for finely diced cubes or slippery little spheres that ricochet
and roll at a touch of the tines
I remember,
as a child, questioning this pointless prohibition. What is so
terrible, I asked, about using your silverware in an efficient
and perfectly sanitary way? It's not as if I were asking to eat
mashed potatoes with my hands. I lost the argument, as all children
do, when faced with the rejoinder "Because I said so,"
and for decades I silently grumbled about the unintelligibility
of the rules of etiquette. Then one day, while doing research
for this book, the scales fell from my eyes, the enigma evaporated,
and I forever put aside my resentment of the no-knife rule.
Pinker attributes
his "epiphany" to reading Norbert
Elias's The
Civilizing Process, which documents how European society
became more refined, more considerate, more self-controlled
more civilised, in short in the centuries either side of
the start of the modern era. He describes some of the over-emotional,
frequently violent, and at times frankly childish behaviours of
our ancestors, and quotes Dorothy Sayers: "The idea that a
strong man should react to great personal and national calamities
by a slight compression of the lips and by silently throwing his
cigarette into the fireplace is of very recent origin." In
the medieval period and before, Pinker and Elias both argue, people
were far less prone to resisting their immediate emotional impulses.
Where it gets
interesting from the table-manners point of view is when Pinker
starts quoting the great philosopher Erasmus, who, in between contemplating
the deeper truths of the universe, took some time to write an etiquette
manual called On Civility in Boys. The things he warns people off
doing which, you would think, implies that they were commonly
enough done to make it worth warning are unexpected, especially
those dealing with bodily effluvia:
- Don't foul
the staircases, corridors, closets or wall hangings with urine
or other filth
- Don't relieve
yourself in front of ladies, or before doors or windows of court
chambers
Read
the rest of the article
July
13, 2012
Copyright
© 2012 Daily Telegraph
|