Technology Keeping Internet Freedom Ahead of Censorship
by Bob Adelmann
The
New American
Efforts by
the Federal Communication Commission (FCC) to regulate the Internet
may become irrelevant if the new
technology being developed succeeds as expected. When the U.S.
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia ruled
against the FCC last December, the FCC rewrote its rules to
allow them to regulate the Internet anyway through the whitewash
called net neutrality. Verizon immediately filed suit
to overrule the new attempt, and a House subcommittee in March voted
to invalidate the actions of the FCC. But the new rules remain in
place until the issue is decided.
All of which
may be irrelevant as new technology, called Telex, is being developed
as a work-around for any such attempts by the FCC. Alex
Halderman (pictured above left), an assistant professor of computer
science at the University of Michigan, is one of the developers
of the software. In a recent interview he explained that people
living under Internet censorship are already able to connect to
third-party servers outside their country, but that it doesnt
take long for the government to find these servers and block them.
Telex, on the other hand, turns the entire Internet into an anti-censorship
device. He says:
First, theres
software that you install on your computer. And then there are
devices that we call Telex stations that internet service providers
(ISPs) outside the country
put on
the wires that are
carrying traffic.
So, if youre
in China, and you want access to a banned site like YouTube, you
just type YouTube.com into your browser, and the Telex station
will see that connection, and disguise it as something innocuous.
You might be watching YouTube, but to a censor, it will just seem
as if youre visiting a harmless, non-blocked site.
We like to
envision this technology as a
response to government-level
censorship
Telex is the
next advance in technology from the mirroring that supporters
of WikiLeaks used to duplicate its information the day after the
original WikiLeaks site was shut down. In a Twitter message posted
afterwards, WikiLeaks now has 355 sites
thanks to YOU.
With that mirroring technology, removing the files Wikileaks exposed
to the world through the Internet will likely be impossible. Not
that the FCC isnt going to try, however. As
noted by Charles Scaliger at The New American, The
U.S. government has shown that it is not only willing but capable
of censoring Internet content and of punishing those deemed guilty
of collaboration with purveyors of censored content. It is a very
small step from the crusade against WikiLeaks to broader efforts
to purge the Internet of all dissent labeled as hate speech.
It is not
at all difficult, for example, to imagine the federal government
barring
all online criticism of the Federal Reserve, in the interest of
preserving financial stability (i.e., the status quo).
The battle
over control of the Internet has rather little to do with barring
files from WikiLeaks. Its much more important than that: its
control over the flow of information to citizens. And that means
overriding the guarantee under the First Amendment that Congress
shall make no law
abridging the freedom of speech, or of the
press
As Founder James Madison wrote: A people
who mean to be their own governors must arm themselves with [the]
power which knowledge gives.
Read
the rest of the article
August
25, 2011
Copyright
© 2011 The New American
|