Socialist or Fascist?
by Thomas Sowell
Recently
by Thomas Sowell: Big
Lies in Politics
It bothers
me a little when conservatives call Barack Obama a "socialist."
He certainly is an enemy of the free market, and wants politicians
and bureaucrats to make the fundamental decisions about the economy.
But that does not mean that he wants government ownership of the
means of production, which has long been a standard definition of
socialism.
What President
Obama has been pushing for, and moving toward, is more insidious:
government control of the economy, while leaving ownership in private
hands. That way, politicians get to call the shots but, when their
bright ideas lead to disaster, they can always blame those who own
businesses in the private sector.
Politically,
it is heads-I-win when things go right, and tails-you-lose when
things go wrong. This is far preferable, from Obama's point of view,
since it gives him a variety of scapegoats for all his failed policies,
without having to use President Bush as a scapegoat all the time.
Government
ownership of the means of production means that politicians also
own the consequences of their policies, and have to face responsibility
when those consequences are disastrous – something that Barack Obama
avoids like the plague.
Thus the Obama
administration can arbitrarily force insurance companies to cover
the children of their customers until the children are 26 years
old. Obviously, this creates favorable publicity for President Obama.
But if this and other government edicts cause insurance premiums
to rise, then that is something that can be blamed on the "greed"
of the insurance companies.
The same principle,
or lack of principle, applies to many other privately owned businesses.
It is a very successful political ploy that can be adapted to all
sorts of situations.
One of the
reasons why both pro-Obama and anti-Obama observers may be reluctant
to see him as fascist is that both tend to accept the prevailing
notion that fascism is on the political right, while it is obvious
that Obama is on the political left.
Back in the
1920s, however, when fascism was a new political development, it
was widely – and correctly – regarded as being on the political
left. Jonah Goldberg's great book Liberal
Fascism cites overwhelming evidence of the fascists' consistent
pursuit of the goals of the left, and of the left's embrace of the
fascists as one of their own during the 1920s.
Mussolini,
the originator of fascism, was lionized by the left, both in Europe
and in America, during the 1920s. Even Hitler, who adopted fascist
ideas in the 1920s, was seen by some, including W.E.B. Du Bois,
as a man of the left.
It was in the
1930s, when ugly internal and international actions by Hitler and
Mussolini repelled the world, that the left distanced themselves
from fascism and its Nazi offshoot – and verbally transferred these
totalitarian dictatorships to the right, saddling their opponents
with these pariahs.
What
socialism, fascism and other ideologies of the left have in common
is an assumption that some very wise people – like themselves –
need to take decisions out of the hands of lesser people, like the
rest of us, and impose those decisions by government fiat.
The left's
vision is not only a vision of the world, but also a vision of themselves,
as superior beings pursuing superior ends. In the United States,
however, this vision conflicts with a Constitution that begins,
"We the People..."
That is why
the left has for more than a century been trying to get the Constitution's
limitations on government loosened or evaded by judges' new interpretations,
based on notions of "a living Constitution" that will take decisions
out of the hands of "We the People," and transfer those decisions
to our betters.
The self-flattery
of the vision of the left also gives its true believers a huge ego
stake in that vision, which means that mere facts are unlikely to
make them reconsider, regardless of what evidence piles up against
the vision of the left, and regardless of its disastrous consequences.
Only our own
awareness of the huge stakes involved can save us from the rampaging
presumptions of our betters, whether they are called socialists
or fascists. So long as we buy their heady rhetoric, we are selling
our birthright of freedom.
June
19, 2012
Thomas
Sowell is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution at Stanford
University. His Web site is www.tsowell.com.
To find out more about Thomas Sowell and read features by other
Creators Syndicate columnists and cartoonists, visit the Creators
Syndicate web page.
The
Best of Thomas Sowell
Copyright ©
2012 Creators Syndicate
|