The Media and 'Bullying'
by Thomas Sowell
Recently
by Thomas Sowell: Reverse
Racism
Back in the
1920s, the intelligentsia on both sides of the Atlantic were loudly
protesting the execution of political radicals Sacco and Vanzetti,
after what they claimed was an unfair trial. Supreme Court Justice
Oliver Wendell Holmes wrote to his young leftist friend Harold Laski,
pointing out that there were "a thousand-fold worse cases" involving
black defendants, "but the world does not worry over them."
Holmes said:
"I cannot but ask myself why this so much greater interest in red
than black."
To put it bluntly,
it was a question of whose ox was gored. That is, what groups were
in vogue at the moment among the intelligentsia. Blacks clearly
were not.
The current
media and political crusade against "bullying" in schools seems
likewise to be based on what groups are in vogue at the moment.
For years, there have been local newspaper stories about black kids
in schools in New York and Philadelphia beating up Asian classmates,
some beaten so badly as to require medical treatment.
But the national
media hear no evil, see no evil and speak no evil. Asian Americans
are not in vogue today, just as blacks were not in vogue in the
1920s.
Meanwhile,
the media are focused on bullying directed against youngsters who
are homosexual. Gays are in vogue.
Most of the
stories about the bullying of gays in schools are about words directed
against them, not about their suffering the violence that has long
been directed against Asian youngsters or about the failure of the
authorities to do anything serious to stop black kids from beating
up Asian kids.
Where youngsters
are victims of violence, whether for being gay or whatever, that
is where the authorities need to step in. No decent person wants
to see kids hounded, whether by words or deeds, and whether the
kids are gay, Asian or whatever.
But there is
still a difference between words and deeds – and it is a difference
we do not need to let ourselves be stampeded into ignoring. The
First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States guarantees
freedom of speech – and, like any other freedom, it can be abused.
If we are going
to take away every Constitutional right that has been abused by
somebody, we are going to end up with no Constitutional rights.
Already, on
too many college campuses, there are vaguely worded speech codes
that can punish students for words that may hurt somebody's feelings
– but only the feelings of groups that are in vogue.
Women can say
anything they want to men, or blacks to whites, with impunity. But
strong words in the other direction can bring down on students the
wrath of the campus thought police – as well as punishments that
can extend to suspension or expulsion.
Is this what
we want in our public schools?
The school
authorities can ignore the beating up of Asian kids but homosexual
organizations have enough political clout that they cannot be ignored.
Moreover, there are enough avowed homosexuals among journalists
that they have their own National Lesbian and Gay Journalists Association
– so continuing media publicity will ensure that the authorities
will have to "do something."
But political
pressures to "do something" have been behind many counterproductive
and even dangerous policies.
A
grand jury report about bullying in the schools of San Mateo County,
California, brought all sorts of expressions of concern from school
authorities – but no definition of "bullying" nor any specifics
about just what they plan to do about it.
Meanwhile,
a law has been passed in California that mandates teaching about
the achievements of gays in the public schools. Whether this will
do anything to stop either verbal or physical abuse of gay kids
is very doubtful.
But it will
advance the agenda of homosexual organizations and can turn homosexuality
into yet another of the subjects on which words on only one side
are permitted. Our schools are already too lacking in the basics
of education to squander even more time on propaganda for politically
correct causes that are in vogue. We do not need to create special
privileges in the name of equal rights.
October
25, 2011
Thomas
Sowell is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution at Stanford
University. His Web site is www.tsowell.com.
To find out more about Thomas Sowell and read features by other
Creators Syndicate columnists and cartoonists, visit the Creators
Syndicate web page.
The
Best of Thomas Sowell
Copyright ©
2011 Creators Syndicate
|