Invincible Ignorance
by Thomas Sowell
Recently
by Thomas Sowell: Christmas
Books
Must every
tragic mass shooting bring out the shrill ignorance of "gun control"
advocates?
The key fallacy
of so-called gun control laws is that such laws do not in fact control
guns. They simply disarm law-abiding citizens, while people bent
on violence find firearms readily available.
If gun control
zealots had any respect for facts, they would have discovered this
long ago, because there have been too many factual studies over
the years to leave any serious doubt about gun control laws being
not merely futile but counterproductive.
Places and
times with the strongest gun control laws have often been places
and times with high murder rates. Washington, D.C., is a classic
example, but just one among many.
When it comes
to the rate of gun ownership, that is higher in rural areas than
in urban areas, but the murder rate is higher in urban areas. The
rate of gun ownership is higher among whites than among blacks,
but the murder rate is higher among blacks. For the country as a
whole, hand gun ownership doubled in the late 20th century, while
the murder rate went down.
The few counter-examples
offered by gun control zealots do not stand up under scrutiny. Perhaps
their strongest talking point is that Britain has stronger gun control
laws than the United States and lower murder rates.
But, if you
look back through history, you will find that Britain has had a
lower murder rate than the United States for more than two centuries
– and, for most of that time, the British had no more stringent
gun control laws than the United States. Indeed, neither country
had stringent gun control for most of that time.
In the middle
of the 20th century, you could buy a shotgun in London with no questions
asked. New York, which at that time had had the stringent Sullivan
Law restricting gun ownership since 1911, still had several times
the gun murder rate of London, as well as several times the London
murder rate with other weapons.
Neither guns
nor gun control was the reason for the difference in murder rates.
People were the difference.
Yet many of
the most zealous advocates of gun control laws, on both sides of
the Atlantic, have also been advocates of leniency toward criminals.
In Britain,
such people have been so successful that legal gun ownership has
been reduced almost to the vanishing point, while even most convicted
felons in Britain are not put behind bars. The crime rate, including
the rate of crimes committed with guns, is far higher in Britain
now than it was back in the days when there were few restrictions
on Britons buying firearms.
In 1954, there
were only a dozen armed robberies in London but, by the 1990s –
after decades of ever tightening gun ownership restrictions – there
were more than a hundred times as many armed robberies.
Gun
control zealots' choice of Britain for comparison with the United
States has been wholly tendentious, not only because it ignored
the history of the two countries, but also because it ignored other
countries with stronger gun control laws than the United States,
such as Russia, Brazil and Mexico. All of these countries have higher
murder rates than the United States.
You could compare
other sets of countries and get similar results. Gun ownership has
been three times as high in Switzerland as in Germany, but the Swiss
have had lower murder rates. Other countries with high rates of
gun ownership and low murder rates include Israel, New Zealand,
and Finland.
Guns are not
the problem. People are the problem – including people who are determined
to push gun control laws, either in ignorance of the facts or in
defiance of the facts.
There is innocent
ignorance and there is invincible, dogmatic and self-righteous ignorance.
Every tragic mass shooting seems to bring out examples of both among
gun control advocates.
Some years
back, there was a professor whose advocacy of gun control led him
to produce a "study" that became so discredited that he resigned
from his university. This column predicted at the time that this
discredited study would continue to be cited by gun control advocates.
But I had no idea that this would happen the very next week in the
9th Circuit Court of Appeals.
December
18, 2012
Thomas
Sowell is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution at Stanford
University. His Web site is www.tsowell.com.
To find out more about Thomas Sowell and read features by other
Creators Syndicate columnists and cartoonists, visit the Creators
Syndicate web page.
The
Best of Thomas Sowell
Copyright ©
2012 Creators Syndicate
|