Jim
Rogers decries the growing uncertainty and recklessness of global
central planners as the world enters unchartered financial markets:
For the
first time in recorded history, we have nearly every central bank
printing money and trying to debase their currency. This has never
happened before. How its going to work out, I don't know.
It just depends on which one goes down the most and first, and
they take turns. When one says a currency is going down, the question
is against what? because they are all trying to debase
themselves. Its a peculiar time in world history.
I own the
dollar, not because I have any confidence in the dollar and not
because its sound its a terribly flawed currency
but I expect more currency turmoil, more financial turmoil.
During periods like that, people, for whatever reason, flee to
the U.S. dollar as a safe haven. It is not a safe haven, but it
is perceived that way by some people. Thats why the dollar
is going up. Thats why I own it. Will I own it in five years,
ten years? I don't know.
It makes it
extremely difficult for the investor looking for acceptable risk/reward,
or the saver looking to protect their purchasing power; as in Rogers'
view, all options have their problems:
I own gold
and silver and precious metals. I own all commodities, which is
a better way to play as they debase currencies. I own more agriculture
than just about anything else in real assets because of the reasons
we discussed before. We were talking before about the risk-free
or worry-free investment. Even gold: the Indian politicians are
talking about coming down hard on gold, and India is the largest
buyer of gold in the world. If Indian politicians do something
whether its foolish or not is irrelevant if
they do something, gold could go down a lot. So I own it. Im
not selling it. But everything has problems.
To Rogers,
the bigger danger that concerns him is the hollowing out of the
'saving class' resulting from this situation. Central planners'
policies are punishing the prudent in favor of rescuing the irresponsible.
This has happened before in world history, and the aftermath has
always had grievous economic, social and often human
costs:
Throughout
our history any countrys history the people
who save their money and invest for their future are the ones
that you build an economy, a society, and a nation on.
In America,
many people saved their money, put it aside, and didnt buy
four or five houses with no job and no money down. They did what
most people would consider the right thing, and what historically
has been the right thing. But now, unfortunately, those people
are being wiped out, because they are getting 0% return, or virtually
no return, on their savings and their investments. Were
wiping them out at the expense of people who went deeply into
debt, people who did what most people would consider the wrong
thing at the expense of people who did the right thing. This,
long-term, has terrible consequences for any nation, any society,
any economy.
If you go
back in history, you'll see what happed to the Germans when they
wiped out their savings class in the 1920s. It didnt lead
to good things down the road for Germany. It didnt lead
to good things for Italy, which did the same thing. There were
plenty of countries where it wiped out the people who saved and
invested for their future. Its usually a serious, political
reaction, desperation in some cases, and looking for a savior
and easy answers is usually what happens when you destroy the
people who save and invest for the future.
Click the play
button below to listen to Chris' interview with Jim Rogers (18m:59s):