View
EFF's updated Map
of Domestic Drone Authorizations in a larger window.
(Clicking this link will serve content from Google.)
The
Federal Aviation Administration has finally released a
new
drone authorization list. This list, released in response
to EFF’s
Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit, includes
law enforcement agencies and universities across the country,
and—for the first time—an Indian tribal agency. In all,
the list includes more than 20 new entities over the FAA’s
original list, bringing to 81 the total number of
public entities that have applied for FAA drone authorizations
through October 2012.
Some
of these new drone license applicants include:
- The
State Department
- National
Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)
- Barona
Band of Mission Indians Risk Management Office (near
San Diego, California)
- Canyon
County Sheriff’s Office (Idaho)
- Clackamas
County Sheriff’s Office (Northwest Oregon)
- Grand
Forks Sheriff’s Department (North Dakota)
- King
County Sheriff’s Office (covering Seattle, Washington)
And
several new entities in Ohio, including:
- Medina
County Sheriff’s Office
- Ohio
Department of Transportation
- Sinclair
Community College
- Lorain
County Community College
The
list comes amid extensive controversy over a newly-released
memo documenting the CIA’s policy on the targeted
killing of American citizens and on the heels of news
that Charlottesville, Virginia has just become one of
the first
cities in the country to ban drones. This new list
should contribute to the debate over whether using domestic
drones for surveillance is consistent with the Constitution
and with American values.
As
we’ve written
in the past, drone use in the United States implicates
serious privacy and civil liberties concerns. Although
drones can be used for neutral,
or even for positive purposes, drones are also capable
of highly advanced and, in
some cases, almost constant surveillance, and they
can amass large amounts of data. Even the smallest drones
can carry a host of surveillance equipment, from video
cameras and thermal imaging to GPS tracking and cellphone
eavesdropping tools. They can also be equipped with advanced
forms of radar detection, license plate cameras, and facial
recognition. And, as recent reporting from PBS
and Slate
shows, surveillance tools, like the military’s development
of gigapixel
technology capable of “tracking
people and vehicles across an entire city,” are improving
rapidly.
EFF
hopes this list will spur more people to ask their local
law enforcement agencies about their drone programs. EFF
has partnered with MuckRock
to make it easier to ask for and disseminate this
information. We also encourage people to ask hard questions
of government officials about who is funding drone development
in their communities and what policies the government
will demand agencies follow if they fly drones. We need
greater transparency and citizen push-back to protect
Americans from privacy-invasive domestic drone use.
You
can find the new list here.