Roman Disaster Redux: Private Sector Collects Debts
The Daily Bell
Panetta] also testified at the hearing on the defense budget. "The
days of large growth, unlimited defense budgets are over. "Our
challenge will be to design budgets that eliminate wasteful and
duplicative spending while protecting those core elements that we
absolutely need for our nation's defense." He later said "the
next Pearl Harbor that we face could well be a cyber attack"
and that "we are no longer in the cold war, more like the blizzard
war." If confirmed, Mr. Panetta, will be the 23rd U.S. Defense
Secretary. ~ CSpan
Social Theme: Relax, we are trying to DEFEND YOU. (No, we're
Analysis: CIA Director Leon Panetta said in a recent hearing
that the US may soon face a cyber attack that would be the equivalent
of Pearl Harbor. (See excerpt above.) Pearl Harbor was a huge (possibly
false flag) event that convulsed the US and provided a pretext for
the US to go to war. We've written several recent articles now suggesting
that Western powers-that-be have in mind expanding the wars in Eurasia
When the power
elite's faux-economies collapse, as they always do, the solution
is usually a war of some sort. It is one of the biggest dominant
social themes of all. War is the ultimate fear-based promotion
the idea that the state (which is no good at anything else)
can protect and defend citizens from its "enemies." Usually,
when one closely examines the situation, the enemies have been made
up, at least initially. The Internet has been making war harder
War runs hand-in-hand
with economics. When the economy flatlines, modern warfare is often
the answer of those that seek to continue their control of society.
Fiat money, the current manifestation of Western economies, is a
very effective tool for control and consolidation. But like other
forms of price-fixing, it doesn't work over the long term. Western
power elites, based out of the City of London, know this. There
are over 100 central banks around the world that are coordinated
by the secretive BIS and all of them can basically print money at
will. Even when there is supposedly public oversight of these banks,
there is no oversight.
ruin the BIS inflicts on the world is intended to increase the pressure
for centralization for true world government run by Western
elites. This is not conjecture. It is not conspiracy theory. The
UN exists; so do the BIS, the World Bank and the IMF. Also, now,
the International Criminal Court. All are basically post-World War
II Western inventions. Yet those who point that a world government
is being erected bit by bit are labeled conspiracy theorists. The
conspiracy lies with the power elite that is moving ahead with this
unaccountable and dangerous program.
The rush to
world government has speeded up in the 2000s. NATO has been given
a new mandate as a kind of "army of the world" via the
UN resolution back in 2005 that did away with the Peace of Westphalia
and substituted "Responsibility to Protect" also
known as R2P.
The Peace of
Westphalia, created hundreds of years ago, recognized national borders.
R2P DEMANDS that nation-states as a group interfere with nations
that are "threatening" their citizens. Of course, the
Anglo-American power elites run the UN through the Security Council.
Now these elites can claim that a particular country (one they want
to undermine) is threatening citizens and turn a NATO coalition
of the willing on them. This is what's happening in Libya, Syria,
the world, over the past six months, the Anglo-American elites (in
league with France) have begun to generate numerous wars and conflicts
up to 600 or so "hot spots" worldwide. This is
apparently a deliberate policy of destabilization that is being
supported and even initiated by CIA-trained youth groups such as
elites must understand that fiat-money inflation has plunged the
world into a rolling Depression. As we have pointed out many times,
China is probably next on the list. There is no real escape from
this Depression not in the short term, and thus the elites
are apparently faced with a problem: They must sustain the system
as it is until they can make the transition to true world government.
elites have faced problems before (in the past 300 years anyway)
they have apparently engineered wars. The plan evidently and obviously
was to do so again in the 21st century. But the Internet has made
this kind of manipulation much more difficult. Like the Gutenberg
Press before it, the Internet is causing a massive upheaval around
the world that the elites are having difficulty controlling. We
have labeled this the Internet Reformation.
power elites have three main thrusts in our humble view to pursue.
1. They have an evident urgent need to continue their lunge toward
world government. 2. They have to create war and chaos to do so.
(Out of chaos, order.) 3. And finally, they have to ameliorate the
damage that is being done to their plans by the Internet.
false flag within this context would be a kind of masterstroke.
It is certainly not beyond rational discussion. We can see Leon
Panetta (above) laying the groundwork for such an event. The rebuttal
would be that he is merely spelling out dangers that the US faces.
But when someone as powerful and important as Panetta speaks of
such things, the suspicion can legitimately arise that these activities
are actively being planned. An article that appeared over the weekend
at ZeroHedge.com aptly summarized the many false flags that the
US in particular has been involved with in the past decades.
is entitled, High-Level American Officials Admit that the United
States Uses False Flag Terror ... And Warn of Future Attacks. It
was submitted by "George Washington" who is apparently
a regular submitter. The article appears on his own "Washington's
Blog" as well.
It points out,
to begin with, that "FBI agents and CIA intelligence officials,
constitutional law expert professor Jonathan Turley, Time Magazine,
Keith Olbermann and the Washington Post have all said that U.S.
government officials 'were trying to create an atmosphere of fear
in which the American people would give them more power.'"
Apparently, former Secretary of Homeland Security - Tom Ridge -
admitted that he was pushed to hike terror alerts to help Bush win
then points out that a former National Security Adviser told the
Senate that the war on terror is "a mythical historical narrative."
It is being purveyed (as we have often pointed out) deliberately
to increase elite control and demonize elite enemies such as Libya's
Colonel Muammar Gaddafi. "Fear makes people stupid and easy
to manipulate and control." Washington adds, "Countries
need to lie about their enemies in order to demonize them sufficiently
so that the people will support the war."
For this reason,
intelligence agencies (apparently invented by the West's banking
families long ago for their personal use) are constantly identifying
threats that later on prove illusory. Washington reminds us that,
"the U.S. Navy's own historians now say that the sinking of
the USS Maine -- the justification for America's entry into the
Spanish-American War -- was probably caused by an internal explosion
of coal, rather than an attack by the Spanish ... It is also now
well-accepted that the Gulf of Tonkin Incident which led to the
Vietnam war was a fiction."
doesn't mention it but one reason Panetta's reference to Pearl Harbor
is worrisome is because there is a good amount of evidence that
Pearl Harbor was a manipulated episode by FDR to bring the US into
World War II. In the 1990s, at least one prominent think tank speculated
that what was needed to reestablish certain elements of national
pride and discipline in America was a "new Pearl Harbor."
These same people went on to become prominent (many of them) in
the George W. Bush administration, which gave rise to the ongoing
suspicions that 9/11 itself might be a false flag, one designed
to reintroduce more authoritarianism into American culture while
simultaneously involving it in wars.
suspicions apply to the first Gulf War, as Washington points out.
At least two "big lies" helped to generate the 1991 Gulf
War: the first was the allegation that the Iraqis were murdering
Kuwaiti babies and the second was that 250,000 Iraqi troops were
massed on the border with Saudi Arabia. Washington doesn't mention
it, but there are also allegations that Saddam Hussein believed
he was in a sense given permission by the West to pursue his Kuwait
invasion due to what may have been a purposefully nebulous response
by the US State Dept. regarding his plans.
updates the old Iraq war with new proposed plans. Former chairman
of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Hugh Shelton recently told
Jon Stewart that a Clinton cabinet member proposed letting Saddam
kill an American pilot as a pretext for war in Iraq. As reported
by the New York Times and other newspapers, he continues, "George
W. Bush also suggested to Tony Blair that a U.S. plane be painted
in United Nations colors so that - if Saddam shot it down - it would
create a casus belli."
The US is a
prime exponent of terrorism, Washington writes. "In '78-79
the Senate was trying to pass a law against international terrorism
- in every version they produced, the lawyers said the US would
be in violation." Former FBI station chief Ted Gundersen has
been outspoken about False Flag terror attacks, saying that most
of them are committed by the CIA and FBI.
The CIA, Washington
writes, admits that it hired Iranians in the 1950s to pose as Communists
and stage bombings in Iran in order to turn the country against
its democratically-elected prime minister. And then, of course,
there is Operation Gladio, which created a secret "stay behind"
army in Europe. "The former Italian Prime Minister, an Italian
judge, and the former head of Italian counterintelligence admit
that NATO, with the help of the Pentagon and CIA, carried out terror
bombings in Italy and other European countries in the 1950s and
blamed the communists, in order to rally people's support for their
governments in Europe in their fight against communism."
We could go
on with this list, and Washington does. It is grim reading, involving
the FBI, CIA and, generally, the top level of the American government
in false-flag efforts and subsequent coverups. Washington reminds
us that those who forget history or do not recognize
are likely doomed to repeat it.
He also points
out that recently a former National Security Adviser informed the
Senate that a false flag act might be blamed on Iran to declare
war. And this, too: "A retired 27-year CIA analyst who prepared
and presented Presidential Daily Briefs and served as a high-level
analyst for several presidents stated that if there was another
major attack in the U.S., it would lead to martial law ... The former
CIA analyst would not put it past the government to 'play fast and
loose' with terror alerts and warnings and even events themselves
in order to rally people behind the flag. We've written about this
sort of false flag numerous times, most recently here: Does
the Elite Need a False Flag?
We have noticed
in the news a good deal of commentary about a cyber attack on the
International Monetary Fund. A feedbacker pointed out yesterday
that this increasingly publicized attack plus Panetta's disturbing
remarks seem to be laying the groundwork for a false flag of this
sort. Also, the Pentagon recently announced that a cyber-attack
on government facilities would be considered an Act of War.
None of the
above is in any sense paranoid or irresponsible to report. One needs
not be involved in "conspiracy theory" to purvey the idea
that Washington and London are contemplating further false flags
to further consolidate power in the face of pan-Western anger over
the current, dysfunctional central banking economy and to further
consolidate world rule.
has revealed the plans of the Western elites, stripped away the
secrecy and showed many what is really going on a perhaps
300-year-old conspiracy to consolidate world power behind the backs
of billions who are simply struggling every day to make a living
and find enough food to eat. Yes, unfortunately, the free-market
has been subverted in every way while billions and trillions
enough to feed the world literally for centuries (or at least to
set up the agricultural infrastructure) is wasted on wars
and weapons systems.
the Pentagon's announcement, a major cyber attack can be the cause
of a war. If a false flag cyber attack was to be created and, say,
attributed to Iran, then the US President might be under an affirmative
obligation to declare war against Iran. No doubt, US powers-that-be
could also justify a significant takeover of the American Internet
and further reduce American civil rights. A cyber false flag might
therefore promote many of the interests of the Anglosphere power
These sorts of things have happened before. It is neither incendiary
nor unpatriotic to recite them. American freedoms (what's left of
them) are under attack by 16 separate US spy agencies and numerous
other aggressive actions taken by Washington DC and London. Western
elites are evidently and obviously at war with their own citizens.
Unfortunately, there is no reason, to think peace will break out
with permission from The
© 2011 The