Vote?
by
Fred Reed
Recently
by Fred Reed: Advice
to a Generic Candidate
Vote? Why?
What candidate in the quadrennial resurrection of the Mickey Mouse
club wants to do anything that I want done?
I want to roll
back the onrushing police state and return to constitutional government.
The plunge into totalitarianism is a far worse danger than World
War Two, in which the US was never in danger of being invaded, and
in which the outcome was a foregone conclusion. Who do I vote for?
No candidate (except Ron Paul: ERP) is against sovietization.
I want to end
our stupid wars, now. Yesterday. Who do I vote for? There is no
antiwar candidate (ERP). Obama sends the troops anywhere he can
think of, and all the Republicans want to attack Iran.
I want to reduce
the military by half and end the militarization of the country that
is bankrupting us. Who do I vote for? (ERP)
I want to reduce
the size of government, get rid of the departments of Education,
Housing and Urban Development, and Commerce, toss the Bureau of
Indian Affairs, and so on. What candidate wants to do these things?
Republicans talk a good show, but which of them actually wants to
cut?
I want to end
affirmative action, which means governmental favor for some citizens
over others, and rely on merit. No candidate speaks of this. Who
do I vote for?
I want to end
the empire, quit meddling in the business of other countries, get
out of South Korea, Japan, and NATO. I don't want to be the world's
mommy. Who do I vote for?
I want to reform
America's dysfunctional system of taxation, go to a sales tax or
flat tax or value-added tax, anything to get IRS off our backs.
It isn't the amount of taxation that I dislike, but the intrusiveness,
mystery, complexity, and lack of recourse. Who do I vote for?
I want to reform
the public schools, outlaw teachers unions, require decent GRE scores
from teachers, cut the propaganda and outlaw drugging of students.
Who do I vote for?
Why vote at
all? Nothing of substance is on the table, other than the desire
of Republicans to attack Iran. Yes, we must get America back on
track, get it going again in the right direction, turn the country
around, get back to the American values that made the nation great,
promote the American Dream none of which means anything. We
must create jobs (how?), get America back to work (how?), and favor
all the vague platitudes intended to mulct fools. All right, I hereby
declare myself mulcted. So why vote?
The elections
are supposed to indicate the presence of democracy, but they do
not. Elections do not determine policy but only the division of
spoils. An election in which candidates take no positions becomes
a high-school popularity contest. The way to have elections without
having a democracy is to let the people vote, but not on anything.
And oh god, the boredom. Night after night, day after day, we will
have this version of Dancing with the Stars, the judges in the media
solemnly that Santorum displayed Confidence, but Gingrich committed
some trivial gaffe or other. Nuance, gesture, composure, but no
substance.
Where is this
going? The country is in grave difficulties and needs desperately
to make hard decisions. Those in power seem to have decided to keep
picking the nation's bones while the corpse slides towards the precipice.
Cosset the morons, assure everyone of everything, avoid the issues
and do nothing that might upset anyone. Greece, Spain, Ireland all
take unpopular measures to try to bring things under control. The
US? It spends on, wars on, as if the gravy days of 1960 had never
ended.
Having a one-party
system called by two names is a technically slick way of disenfranchising
the public without their noticing. In a parliamentary system all
manner of politics would gain expression in proportion to their
prevalence in the population. With two identical parties, no dissenting
view can ever gain office. A masterly dodge, this.
Over the years
I have read or listened to many men rattling on about this and that
arrangement of matters human, socialism, capitalism, republics,
direct democracy, fascism, militarism, all the gang. What the theorists
all seem to overlook is the irresistible buoyancy of excrement.
Communism, theocracy, the divine right of kings, all eventually
fall into the hands of the crafty and unscrupulous. If they don't,
it is only because they haven't gotten around to it.
It has to happen.
Once society becomes more complex than a modest tribe or small town,
once its affairs extend beyond the immediate visual horizon of the
citizens, they become clueless. Most don't have the brains, and
almost none the time or interest, to monitor sprawling bureaucracies
and distant wars. Villains thrive in the shadows.
Vote? You can
choose between Gingrich and Gingrich, between Santorum and Santorum,
or between Gingrich and Santorum which is the same choice, or you
can choose Romney, who is both Santorum and Gingrich. Such a deal.
January
16, 2012
Fred Reed
is author of Nekkid
in Austin: Drop Your Inner Child Down a Well, A
Brass Pole in Bangkok: A Thing I Aspire to Bem, Curmudgeing
Through Paradise: Reports from a Fractal Dung Beetle, Au
Phuc Dup and Nowhere to Go: The Only Really True Book About Viet
Nam, and A
Grand Adventure: Wisdom's Price-Along with Bits and Pieces about
Mexico. Visit his
blog.
Copyright
© 2012 Fred Reed
The
Best of Fred Reed
|