Salt
Lake City attorney Jesse Trentadue filed a motion
Monday asking a federal judge to determine whether he is entitled
to limited discovery into the FBI’s “Sensitive Informant Program.”
In his motion,
Trentadue described the program as one used by the bureau “to
recruit and/or place informants on the staffs of members of the
United States Congress and perhaps even federal judges, in the national
media, within other federal agencies as well as the White House,
on defense teams in high-profile federal and/or state criminal prosecutions,
inside state and local law enforcement agencies, and even among
the clergy of organized religions.”
Trentadue’s
interest in the program stems from questions that have surfaced
during his ongoing investigation into the death of Kenneth
Trentadue, his brother who died in 1995 under suspicious
circumstances while in custody at the U.S. Bureau of Prisons
Federal Transfer Center in Oklahoma City, months after
the Oklahoma
City Bombing.
With his latest
legal maneuver, Trentadue hopes to convince Judge Clark Waddoups
to compel the FBI to provide all documentation outlining what he
describes in the motion as an “unlawful and unconstitutional
domestic spying program.”
The maneuver
comes almost four weeks after the FBI answered
a federal court complaint Trentadue filed under the Freedom
of Information Act to obtain copies of the manual the FBI
uses to recruit and place “sensitive informants.”
Citing national security concerns as the basis for their response,
FBI officials answered that complaint by saying they “can
neither confirm nor deny the allegations [of the Complaint] regarding
its confidential informant program.”
Shown below,
Trentadue’s definition of a “sensitive informant”
is, perhaps, the most interesting aspect of his motion:
“…the
term ‘Sensitive Informant’ is defined as anyone acting,
directly or indirectly and with or without any compensation, on
behalf of the FBI as a member of, person associated with or otherwise
a participant in or observer of the activity or activities of
an entity, organization, group, governmental agency or unit, association
of organizations or individuals, public official, member of Congress,
judge, cleric and/or religious or political organization AND who
does not disclose or reveal to such entity, organization, group,
governmental agency or unit, association of organizations or individuals,
public official, member of Congress, judge, cleric and/or religious
or political organization his or her FBI affiliation.
“A
Sensitive Informant is, in other words, some one who is acting,
directly or indirectly, on behalf of the FBI as an undisclosed
participant in or observer of the activity or activities of an
entity, organization, group, governmental agency or unit, association
of organizations or individuals, public official, member of Congress,
judge, cleric and/or religious or political organization.
“The
term ‘Sensitive Informant’ likewise includes what
the FBI’s current terminology refers to as a ‘Confidential
Human Source’ including any and all sub-categories of Confidential
Human Sources such as, but not limited to, what the FBI refers
to as a ‘Privileged Confidential Human Source,’ who
is someone reporting confidential information to the FBI in violation
of a privilege such as an attorney reporting his client’s confidential
communications, a physician reporting upon his patient’s medical
or mental condition, a cleric informing on a member of his or
her church or other religious organization, etc.
In his motion,
Trentadue requested the judge order FBI officials to answer 11 critical
questions about the scope of their “Sensitive Informant
Program” prior to a yet-to-be-scheduled hearing during
which, according to Trentadue, FBI officials have said they will
file a motion for summary judgment to prevent him access to the
information he seeks.
Looking only
for numbers of Sensitive Informants and not for specific names from
the FBI, Trentadue’s questions target the time frame, “since
January 1, 1995.” In short, he wants to know whether or not
the agency has had Sensitive Informants inside a variety of government
and non-governmental organizations.
Among the government
organizations mentioned in his queries were the state and federal
court systems, the U.S. House of Representatives and U.S. Senate,
federal agencies other than the FBI, federal prosecutors’
offices, and law enforcement agencies at the municipal, county and
state levels.
Curiously,
he also asked whether the FBI has had a Sensitive Informant(s) who
was a cleric or member of the clergy in any religious organization.
Though I doubt
the FBI will answer Trentadue’s questions, I’m convinced
the attorney will continue fighting until he learns the whole truth
about his brother’s death and, perhaps, about the Oklahoma
City Bombing, too.
Click
to read other posts in my series, “Untold Stories of the
OKC Bombing.”