Much has
been made in the press of the manipulation of LIBOR, without much
explanation of the consequences for prices of all things that
depend on supply and demand for bank credit. Outrage focuses on
the activities of avaricious bankers, which is why the connection
never gets made between relatively minor manipulations of credit
pricing by banks and far larger manipulations by central banks.
It is the
latter that should really concern us. Central banks persistently
intervene in markets to keep interest rates below where they would
otherwise be. This leads to artificially high prices for all assets,
since they are bolstered by cheapened credit. The idea that we
have a capitalist economy, where assets are priced on the basis
of their productive value is untrue.
We are far
removed from free markets, or prices that are fairly agreed between
parties without state intervention. It is now impossible for any
business to rely on market pricing, which is why there has been
explosive growth in derivatives. Every derivative exists to hedge
the risk in a transaction, and while that transaction is often
another derivative, ultimately they all exist to hedge risk in
real business activities. Some of this is sensible in free markets,
such as a farmer selling his crop ahead of the harvest to maximise
prices, or a mine selling its product forward in the knowledge
it will have it to deliver; but the bulk of these derivatives
only exist to hedge market uncertainties that are the consequence
of government interventions.
According
to the Bank
for International Settlements, derivatives for non-financial
customers world-wide totalled $46 trillion at the end of last
year, 65% of world GDP, or about 100% ex-government. This is evidence
that genuine entrepreneurial activity is being suffocated by interventions
and manipulations, because an entrepreneur, by definition, is
someone who exploits price differences, not one who seeks to hedge
them.
We should
extend our condemnation of government intervention from interest
rates to government-issued money itself. There can be no certainty
in its future value, making it impossible for a businessman to
calculate margins. An obvious example is the uncertainties facing
any business involving the euro. No one knows who will be in the
eurozone and who will be out of it next year, nor do they know
if it will still exist, let alone whether the euro will be up
or down. Uncertainties resulting from government interventions
are economically damaging.
So all prices
are no longer simply set by buyers and sellers but are manipulated
by governments and central banks. The system that is failing is
not capitalism, but price-rigging by governments. Governments
will always try to persuade us that it is markets, and not them
at fault. They have been doing this to varying degrees for a hundred
years, ever since the abandonment of the gold standard. We are
now on the last lap of this delusion.
We face the
economic
calculation problem identified by von Mises. It was the eventual
undoing of the Soviet Union, and we have fallen into the same
trap.
Reprinted
with permission from GoldMoney.com.