Victim Impact Statement
by Kurt Haskell
Previously
by Kurt Haskell: The
Truth About Flight 253 Has Been Revealed
Every victim of a crime in Michigan is entitled to make a statement
in open court regarding the impact of the crime on their life. The
statement is limited to the victim's physical, emotional and financial
well being as it relates to the crime. Keep that in my as you read
my statement. Below is a copy of the victim impact statement I gave
today at the Underwear Bomber sentencing hearing. When reading my
statement, keep in mind that I am a practicing attorney in the State
of Michigan. In addition, I regularly practice in the Court the
hearings are taking place at and therefore, I am somewhat limited
as to what I can say. We were limited to 5 minutes each.
I wish to thank the Court for allowing me these 5 minutes to make
my statement. My references to the government in this statement
refer to the Federal Government excluding this Court and the prosecution.
On Christmas Day 2009, my wife and I were returning from an African
safari and had a connecting flight through Amsterdam. As we waited
for our flight, we sat on the floor next to the boarding gate. What
I witnessed while sitting there and subsequent events have changed
my life forever. While I sat there, I witnessed Umar dressed in
jeans and a white t-shirt, being escorted around security by a man
in a tan suit who spoke perfect American English and who aided Umar
in boarding without a passport. The airline gate worker initially
refused Umar boarding until the man in the tan suit intervened.
The event meant nothing to me at the time. Little did I know that
Umar would try to kill me a few hours later as our flight approached
Detroit. The final 10 minutes of our flight after the attack were
the worst minutes of my life. During those 10 minutes I sat paralyzed
in fear. Unfortunately, what happened next has had an even greater
impact on my life and has saddened me further.
When we landed, I was shocked that our plane taxied up to the gate.
I was further shocked that we were forced to sit on the plane for
20 minutes with powder from the so called bomb all over the cabin.
The officers that boarded the plane did nothing to ensure our safety
and did not check for accomplices or other explosive devices. Several
passengers trampled through parts of the bomb as they exited the
plane. We were then taken into the terminal with our unchecked carry
on bags. Again, there was no concern for our safety even though
Umar told the officers that there was another bomb on board as he
exited the plane. I wondered why nobody was concerned about our
safety, accomplices or other bombs and the lack of concern worried
me greatly. I immediately told the FBI my story in order to help
catch the accomplice I had seen in Amsterdam. It soon became obvious
that the FBI wasn't interested in what I had to say, which upset
me further. For one month the government refused to admit the existence
of the man in the tan suit before changing course and admitting
his existence in an ABC News article on January 22, 2010. That was
the last time the government talked about this man. The video that
would prove the truth of my account has never been released. I continue
to be emotional upset that the video has not been released. The
Dutch police, meanwhile, in this article (show article), also confirmed
that Umar did not show his passport in Amsterdam which also meant
that he didn't go through security as both are in the same line
in Amsterdam. It upsets me that the government refuses to admit
this fact.
I became further saddened from this case, when Patrick Kennedy
of the State Department during Congressional hearings, admitted
that Umar was a known terrorist, was being followed, and the U.S.
allowed him into the U.S. so that it could catch Umar's accomplices.
I was once again shocked and saddened when Michael Leiter of the
National Counter terrorism Center admitted during these same hearings
that intentionally letting terrorists into the U.S. was a frequent
practice of the U.S. Government. I cannot fully explain my sadness,
disappointment and fear when I realized that my government allowed
an attack on me intentionally.
During this time, I questioned if my country intentionally put
a known terrorist onto my flight with a live bomb. I had many sleepless
nights over this issue. My answer came shortly thereafter. In late
2010, the FBI admitted to giving out intentionally defective bombs
to the Portland Christmas Tree Bomber,the Wrigley Field Bomber and
several others. Further, Mr. Chambers was quoted in the Free Press
on January 11, 2011 when he indicated that the government's own
explosives experts had indicated that Umar's bomb was impossibly
defective. I wondered how that could be. Certainly, I thought, Al
Qaeda wouldn't go through all of the trouble to plan such an attack
only to provide the terrorist with an impossibly defective bomb.
I attended nearly all of the pretrial hearings. At the hearing
on January 28, 2011, I was greatly disappointed by the prosecution's
request to block evidence from Mr. Chambers "as it could then
be able to be obtained by third parties, who could use it in a civil
suit against the government". It really bothered me that the
government apparently was admitting to wrongdoing of some kind as
it admitted that it was concerned it would be sued. It further upset
me to know that the government was putting its own interests ahead
of those of the passengers.
When I attended the jury selection hearings, I questioned why versions
of the same two questions kept coming up, those being:
1. Do you think whether you'll be able to tell whether something
is actually a bomb? and
2. Do you realize that sometimes the media doesn't always tell the
truth?
I continued to be greatly saddened at this point as I felt the
truth continued to be hidden.
When Umar listed me as his only witness, I was happy to testify,
not on his behalf, but on behalf of the truth. I never expected
to testify, as my eyewitness account would have been too damaging
to the myth that the government and media are putting forward. A
mere 5 days after I was announced as a witness, there was an inexplicable
guilty plea which exasperated me as I no longer would be testifying.
In closing I will just say that regardless of how the media and
government try to shape the public perception of this case, I am
convinced that Umar was given an intentionally defective bomb by
a U.S. Government agent and placed on our flight without showing
a passport or going through security, to stage a false terrorist
attack to be used to implement various government policies.
The effect this matter has had on my life has been astounding and
due to this case, I will never trust the government in any matter,
ever.
In regards to sentencing, nothing I've said excuses the fact that
Umar tried to kill me. He has waived his valid claim to the entrapment
defense. Umar, you are not a great Muslim martyr, you are merely
a "Patsy". I ask the court to impose the mandatory sentence.
This appeared
on Kurt Haskell's blog.
February
18, 2012
Copyright
© 2012 Kurt Haskell
|