What It Really Means To Support the Troops
by
Joel Poindexter
Recently
by Joel Poindexter: Confessions
of a Former Gang Member
This essay
is based on a letter I sent to a conservative organization. They
were soliciting donations of hygiene products for an event they
sponsored in support of deployed soldiers. I have updated it and
edited it for this site.
Among the principals
held by conservatives are limited government, fiscal responsibility,
and adherence to the constitution. How any group claims these tenets
as principals and yet supports the state’s wars of aggression is
beyond my understanding. If "war is the health of the state,"
as Randolph Bourne wrote, then conservatives are the health of war.
Limited governments,
if such a thing could exist, cannot wage perpetual war; only a leviathan
state can do so. A truly limited government would be unable to expropriate
enough money through taxes, borrowing, and printing to fund these
foreign conquests. A limited government would also be powerless
to conscript an army for its machinations, or coercively retain
those already in the ranks. This last item is especially important
now, as nearly 100,000 service members have had their enlistment
terms involuntarily extended in the past ten years, including the
author.
Wars are not
fiscally responsible; they come at an incredible cost, both in terms
of human life and in treasure. The U.S. government right now is
spending trillions of dollars on no less than seven undeclared,
open-ended, no-win wars. None of which serve the interests of the
people in whose names they are waged.
None of the
dozens upon dozens of military engagements the U.S. government has
undertaken in the past seven decades has been constitutional. Without
exception, each has been a war of aggression. Each was fought at
the prerogative of the president, who has behaved more like a King,
and who was never meant to have war-making powers.
Many suggest
they are not supporting the wars, only the troops. This is patently
wrong. Anyone who glorifies "their sacrifice," necessarily
supports the wars these soldiers are fighting in. Likewise, to espouse
the false claim that these men and women are "defending freedom"
is to endorse current U.S. foreign policy, including the wars.
It is either
tragic naïveté or willful deception to assert that these
wars are meant to defend freedom. The vast warfare/national security
state that has been erected in the past ten years has done nothing
to promote freedom here, or abroad. To date, the U.S. government
has suspended Habeas Corpus; it has detained many thousands of people
and held them without charges in secret prisons all around the world.
It violates the sovereignty of other nations and summarily executes
their people. It convenes panels in secret, drafting lists of citizens
to be hunted and killed without due process, or even so much as
the pretense of judicial oversight. Children are not even free from
such tyranny. It has callously butchered hundreds of thousands of
innocent men, women, and children, displaced many millions, and
destroyed billions of dollars of private property. Torture, or its
equally disgusting euphemism, "enhanced interrogation,"
is considered by many to be perfectly acceptable, even virtuous.
Of course when they do it to us it is considered barbaric.
It is precisely
this moral relativism that perpetuates our problems. By refusing
to see the humanity in the people whose lives are destroyed in the
name of "freedom" we only ensure that others will be driven
to take up arms against us out of retaliation. Vengeance is the
single greatest factor in motivating terrorism; not an abstract
hatred of our lifestyle. It is shameful that so many in this country
hold one American citizen in higher regard than one person from
another country. Our value as human beings is not determined by
which government claims legal authority over us, nor is it by which
arbitrary set of boundaries we are born within. Our value is the
same in the eyes of our Creator, and is derived simply from our
being His.
The federal
government has claimed the right to take nude photos of anyone wishing
to travel by airplane in this country, and to unnecessarily subject
them to potentially dangerous levels of radiation. Those who object
are instead treated to what in any other case would be considered
sexual molestation. Not even the disabled, the young, nor the elderly
can escape this abuse. Our persons, property and effects are no
longer secure from federal agents, as warrants issued upon probable
cause are from a bygone era. This is the freedom they are fighting
to defend, and which these conservatives support?
I would prefer
they actually support the troops. This can only be done by relentlessly
fighting to bring them home. And by closing the 900 U.S. bases around
the world, ceasing to support corrupt and repressive regimes, and
by ending the U.S. Empire and all such intervention. As a veteran
twice over from the occupation of Iraq, I can think of no better
gift to the men and women of the U.S. military than to bring them
home. Somehow a toothbrush and a bottle of shampoo just doesn’t
measure up.
Nothing says
"I support the troops" more than declaring that from this
point forward, none of them will die needlessly, thousands of miles
from home, fighting unlawful wars of aggression. That they need
not fear horrific injuries, nor have their minds irreparably scarred
by the trauma and horrors of warfare. Nothing would be better for
their families as well. Oh that they can find peace in the knowledge
that their father or mother, brother or sister, husband or wife,
son or daughter will no longer have to leave for extended periods
of time, fearful they’ll never return.
November
11, 2011
Joel
Poindexter [send him
mail] is a student at Johnson County Community College working
toward a degree in economics. He lives near Kansas City with his
wife and daughter. See his
blog.
Copyright
© 2011 by LewRockwell.com. Permission to reprint in whole or in
part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.
|