Only
'Lone Wolves' Commit Terror?
by Russ Baker
WhoWhatWhy.com
Recently
by Russ Baker: War,
Syrian-Style? Has Assad Ordered Mass Rapes?
Just before
the opening of the London games, a former Olympic Committee executive
declared
in a New York Times interview that he had confidence in
how this year’s spectacle would unfold:
“I think
in the end London will more than hold its own against any previous
Games. The only black cloud for me is the security agenda and
whether there is some crazy, as they say, lone wolf out there.”
As they
say…some lone wolf.
If that gives
you chills, you aren’t alone. We’ve had enough experience to know
that these statements shouldn’t be taken lightly. Nor should the
underlying principle go unchallenged: that only deranged individuals
provoke mayhem by design.
Media reports
and government statements pretty much reduce terror sponsors to
two types: the “lone wolf,” and countries and entities in current
ill repute. To be sure, for many, the archetype of Olympic terror
is the organized attack: Palestinian Black September members taking
the Israeli team hostage at the 1972 Munich
games, and the bloody climax. Since then, we’ve also had our
share of lone (or allegedly lone) gunmen and bombers, and of (allegedly)
sponsored terror by identified enemies.
Certainly,
Western countries are quick to accuse disfavored regimes, with uneven
levels of accuracy, of atrocities that those regimes quickly deny.
Recently, Iran
has been accused of fomenting numerous acts of terror, including
bombing
a bus full of Israelis on vacation in Bulgaria, and unverified
allegations of planned massacres and mass rapes have been effective
tools in building public support for war in Libya and Syria.
History has
shown us, however, that acts of violence, with or without declared
sponsorship, are not the exclusive province of crazy loners or renegade
regimes. In fact, we know from experience that, as horrendous as
it sounds, those in power have sometimes terrorized their own populace
while blaming the violence on others. The reasons for this vary
widely, but include justifying retributive acts abroad or domestic
repression.
One classic
technique of creating disorder to justify subsequent repression
or military action is the “false flag” attack, so named to describe
a ship’s flying an enemy flag while attacking one of its own country’s
vessels. The cases in which such attacks were intended to become
the basis for a severe reaction could fill a book. Here are a few:
- The Reichstag
fire, Berlin, 1933: blamed on Communists but most likely instigated
by the Nazis to justify their power grab and subsequent suspension
of basic liberties.
- Operation
Northwoods, Washington, 1962: a plan proposed by high government
officials, involving American forces masquerading as Cubans attacking
American targets. Deaths and injuries of U.S. citizens anticipated.
Rejected by President Kennedy.
- Deaths of
civilians during Buddhist protests in Hue, Vietnam, during June,
1963, caused by plastic explosives. Allegations
that only the CIA possessed such explosives, and that they were
thrown by a Captain James Scott. The bombing campaign, blamed
on the government of South Vietnam, increased unrest in the country,
destabilized the Diem regime, led to a coup, and contributed to
the escalation of American involvement in that country.
- Gladio:
The CIA-sponsored. clandestine “stay-behind” NATO network in post-World
War II Europe, believed to be tied to right-wing terror attacks
that were blamed on the Left. (see the book Puppetmasters
on political terrorism in Italy.)
- The Apartment
House Bombings: A wave of bombings in Russia, 1999, that justified
Moscow’s intervention in Chechnya, and paved the way for Vladimir
Putin’s presidency. (see Chapter 2, Darkness
at Dawn)
- Contacts
between the 9/11 hijackers and the Saudi elite, described in an
exclusive WhoWhatWhy report, which you can read here.
As should be
clear from this list, the use of deadly “false flag” operations
to gain strategic political advantage is not exclusive to regimes
of any particular ideology. The lone wolves, meanwhile, are certainly
out there, but they’re not all as solitary as they might appear.
Reprinted
from WhoWhatWhy.com.
August
3, 2012
Russ
Baker is an award-winning investigative reporter. He has written
for The New Yorker, Vanity Fair, The Nation,
The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Village
Voice and Esquire and dozens of other major domestic and
foreign publications. He has also served as a contributing editor
to the Columbia Journalism Review. Baker received a 2005
Deadline Club award for his exclusive reporting on George W. Bush’s
military record. He is the author of Family
of Secrets: The Bush Dynasty, the Powerful Forces That Put It in
the White House, and What Their Influence Means for America
(Bloomsbury Press, 2009); it was released in paperback as Family
of Secrets: The Bush Dynasty, America’s Invisible Government and
the Hidden History of the Last Fifty Years. For more information
on Russ’s work, see his sites, www.familyofsecrets.com
and www.russbaker.com.
Copyright
© 2012 WhoWhatWhy.com
|