The
Great Thanksgiving Hoax
by
Richard J. Maybury
Each year at
this time school children all over America are taught the official
Thanksgiving story, and newspapers, radio, TV, and magazines devote
vast amounts of time and space to it. It is all very colorful and
fascinating.
It is also
very deceiving. This official story is nothing like what really
happened. It is a fairy tale, a whitewashed and sanitized collection
of half-truths which divert attention away from Thanksgiving's real
meaning.
The official
story has the pilgrims boarding the Mayflower, coming to America
and establishing the Plymouth
colony in the winter of 1620-21. This first winter is hard,
and half the colonists die. But the survivors are hard working and
tenacious, and they learn new farming techniques from the Indians.
The harvest of 1621 is bountiful. The Pilgrims hold a celebration,
and give thanks to God. They are grateful for the wonderful new
abundant land He has given them.
The official
story then has the Pilgrims living more or less happily ever after,
each year repeating the first Thanksgiving. Other early colonies
also have hard times at first, but they soon prosper and adopt the
annual tradition of giving thanks for this prosperous new land called
America.
The problem
with this official story is that the harvest of 1621 was not bountiful,
nor were the colonists hardworking or tenacious. 1621 was a famine
year and many of the colonists were lazy thieves.
In his History
of Plymouth Plantation, the governor of the colony, William
Bradford, reported that the colonists went hungry for years, because
they refused to work in the fields. They preferred instead to steal
food. He says the colony was riddled with "corruption,"
and with "confusion and discontent." The crops were small
because "much was stolen both by night and day, before it became
scarce eatable."
In the harvest
feasts of 1621 and 1622, "all had their hungry bellies filled,"
but only briefly. The prevailing condition during those years was
not the abundance the official story claims, it was famine and death.
The first "Thanksgiving" was not so much a celebration
as it was the last meal of condemned men.
But in subsequent
years something changes. The harvest of 1623 was different. Suddenly,
"instead of famine now God gave them plenty," Bradford
wrote, "and the face of things was changed, to the rejoicing
of the hearts of many, for which they blessed God." Thereafter,
he wrote, "any general want or famine hath not been amongst
them since to this day." In fact, in 1624, so much food was
produced that the colonists were able to begin exporting corn.
What happened?
After the poor
harvest of 1622, writes Bradford, "they began to think how
they might raise as much corn as they could, and obtain a better
crop." They began to question their form of economic organization.
This had required
that "all profits & benefits that are got by trade, working,
fishing, or any other means" were to be placed in the common
stock of the colony, and that, "all such persons as are of
this colony, are to have their meat, drink, apparel, and all provisions
out of the common stock." A person was to put into the common
stock all he could, and take out only what he needed.
This "from
each according to his ability, to each according to his need"
was an early form of socialism, and it is why the Pilgrims were
starving. Bradford writes that "young men that are most able
and fit for labor and service" complained about being forced
to "spend their time and strength to work for other men's wives
and children." Also, "the strong, or man of parts, had
no more in division of victuals and clothes, than he that was weak."
So the young and strong refused to work and the total amount of
food produced was never adequate.
To rectify
this situation, in 1623 Bradford abolished socialism. He gave each
household a parcel of land and told them they could keep what they
produced, or trade it away as they saw fit. In other words, he replaced
socialism with a free market, and that was the end of famines.
Many early
groups of colonists set up socialist states, all with the same terrible
results. At Jamestown, established in 1607, out of every shipload
of settlers that arrived, less than half would survive their first
twelve months in America. Most of the work was being done by only
one-fifth of the men, the other four-fifths choosing to be parasites.
In the winter of 1609-10, called "The Starving Time,"
the population fell from five-hundred to sixty.
Then the Jamestown
colony was converted to a free market, and the results were every
bit as dramatic as those at Plymouth. In 1614, Colony Secretary
Ralph Hamor wrote that after the switch there was "plenty of
food, which every man by his own industry may easily and doth procure."
He said that when the socialist system had prevailed, "we reaped
not so much corn from the labors of thirty men as three men have
done for themselves now."
Before these
free markets were established, the colonists had nothing for which
to be thankful. They were in the same situation as Ethiopians are
today, and for the same reasons. But after free markets were established,
the resulting abundance was so dramatic that the annual Thanksgiving
celebrations became common throughout the colonies, and in 1863,
Thanksgiving became a national holiday.
Thus the real
reason for Thanksgiving, deleted from the official story, is: Socialism
does not work; the one and only source of abundance is free markets,
and we thank God we live in a country where we can have them.
November
24, 2011
Richard
Maybury writes on investments. This article originally appeared
in The
Free Market,
November 1985.
|