Many view
bacon as an unhealthy food but are unaware that the majority of
its fat is monounsaturated and is fairly resistant to heat damage
during cooking
Although
manufacturers label this bacon “nitrite free,” this method actually
generates more nitrite from the celery salt than would ever be
added as a salt. “Nitrite free” bacon can have twice the nitrite
content of bacons cured directly with nitrite salts
Bacon from
pastured pigs contains healthful saturated and monounsaturated
fat, mostly consisting of oleic acid, the type so valued in olive
oil. It also contains palmitoleic acid, which has antimicrobial
properties, phosophatidyl choline that possesses antioxidant activity
superior to Vitamin E, and fat-soluble vitamin D
The healthiest
forms of bacon and other preserved meats are those that are prepared
using time tested age old traditional methods using meat from
healthy animals. If you desire to eat bacon it is preferred to
find bacon from pastured pigs is raised by local farmers that
convert the bacon using time honored methods
By
Dr. Mercola
Just to be
clear, although I have cautioned against the consumption of pork,
I am NOT anti-pork (or anti-bacon). My concern about pork
is that you are cautious about the source of the pork you
consume just as you should be cautious about the source of
your beef, eggs and poultry. If your pork is pasture-raised and
the pigs live in their natural setting eating pig-appropriate food,
then pork can be a nutritious part of your diet.
Pork is arguably
a "healthful" meat from a biochemical perspective, and if consumed
from a humanely raised pastured hog like those on Polyface
Farm and prepared properly, there is likely minimal risk of
infection. However, virtually all of the pork you're likely to consume
will not fit these criteria it is extremely difficult to
find. If you can find a source that does it right, then by all means,
enjoy!
Joel Salatin
of Polyface Farm provides an exceptional example of how hogs should
be raised. I visited his farm and talked with him extensively
about sustainable farming practices, which you can view in the video
below.
By
Kaayla T. Daniel, PhD, CCN
Neal Barnard
MD, head of the Physicians Committee for (Ir) Responsible Medicine,
tried to round up an army of vegans to protest a Bacon Festival
in Iowa last Spring, but succeeded in recruiting only six volunteers.1
Why so few?
Probably fear of bacon!
Not fear of
death by bacon, which is what Dr. Barnard hoped to fuel with anti-meat
rhetoric and billboards of skulls and crossbones, but vegan fears
of succumbing to the lure of bacon itself! Bacon's smell and taste
are so seductive that many vegetarians fear it as "the gateway meat."
But what of
those health risks? What about all that fat, cholesterol and sodium?
And what about nitrites?
It's not just
vegans after all who warn us against bacon. Recently, the Harvard
School of Public Health announced with great fanfare that just a
small daily serving of red meat would increase our likelihood of
death by 13 percent, while a little bacon, hot dogs, sausage or
other processed red meats every day would kill us off 20 percent
faster. 2-3
In fact, the
study was pseudo science at its best an observational study
using notoriously fallible food-frequency questionnaires, with researchers
drawing unwarranted conclusions based on mere associations. Much
ado about nothing, in other words. A careful look at the data suggests
a 0.2-fold increased risk at most. And that's for people eating
supermarket meat from factory farms who also happen to smoke, don't
exercise, and eat their red meat wrapped up in white bread and buns.
4-6
Is it Safe
to Eat Bacon?
Sadly lots
of people assume Harvard's warnings must be valid. Red meat, bacon
and other tasty high-fat foods, after all, have long enjoyed reputations
as being both delicious and dangerous.
Indeed, the
bacon question has been argued for years, now with most non-vegan
internet bloggers concluding that bacon's "not so bad" if used to
add a bit of flavor and crunchiness to "healthy" foods such as salads
and vegetables. Comedian Jim Gaffigan spoofed this on LateNight with Conan O'Brien when he described bits of bacon
as "the fairy dust of the foodcommunity" and eating a salad sprinkled
with bacon as "panning for gold."
A bit more
bacon – even a few strips – sometimes even gets the Food-Police
stamp of approval, provided it's a special treat, of course, and
not a daily indulgence. But such recommendations usually come complete
with a warning to stick with lean bacon, and then cook it so it's
firm but not soft. While that last sounds a bit naughty, it's actually
anti-fat puritanism the goal being to render the soft parts
into fat that can be poured or patted off.
But what if
bacon is actually good for us? What if it actually supports good
health and is not a mortal dietary sin after all? What if we can
eat all we'd like? Naughty propositions to be sure, but ones the
Naughty Nutritionist™ is prepared to argue. And that promise is
not just a strip tease!
What You Need
to Know about Healthy Fats
Bacon's primary
asset is its fat, and that fat surprise! – is primarily monounsaturated.
Fifty percent of the fat in bacon is monounsaturated, mostly consisting
of oleic acid, the type so valued in olive oil. About three percent
of that is palmitoleic acid, a monounsaturate with valuable antimicrobial
properties. About 40 percent of bacon fat is saturated, a level
that worries fat phobics, but is the reason why bacon fat is relatively
stable and unlikely to go rancid under normal storage and cooking
conditions. That's important, given the fact that the remaining
10 percent is in the valuable but unstable form of polyunsaturates.7
Pork fat also
contains a novel form of phosphatidylcholine that possesses antioxidant
activity superior to Vitamin E. This may be one reason why lard
and bacon fat are relatively stable and not prone to rancidity from
free radicals.8
Bacon fat from
pastured pigs also comes replete with fat-soluble vitamin D, provided
it's bacon from foraging pigs that romp outdoors in the sun for
most of year. Factory-farmed pigs kept indoors and fed rations from
soy, casein, corn meal, and other grains, are likely to show low
levels of Vitamin D.
It's a Numbers
Game...
How much Vitamin
D is the question. Most databases suggest 100 to 250 IU per 100
grams, with some of the higher numbers coming from Italy, where
even commercial pigs are more likely to see the great outdoors.9-10However,
far higher numbers have been reported, especially for pastured pigs.
According to
Dr. Mary Enig, USDA laboratories in the 1980s came up with the figure
of 2,800 IUs per 100 grams though that data was never officially
reported by the government agency.11
According to her source at the USDA, the agency chose to suppress
this information because it wanted the public to think its vitamin
D must come from fortified milk and other BigAg products. Whether
the 2,800 IUs figure is valid and represents sophisticated laboratory
testing still not in common use, or a typographical error for 280
IUs is not known. USDA databases from that period do not even include
Vitamin D.
Other unanswered
questions involve the Vitamin A content of bacon fat or lard. USDA
tables both the official tables and the unpublished 1980
findings discovered by Dr. Enig – report levels of zero.12-13
Yet a 1948 study showed that Vitamin A deficiency in rats can be
corrected with lard. Indeed Vitamin A-deficient rats reversed the
deficiency when provided fats that replaced the sucrose in
their chow. Even more interesting, those animals fared better than
those on the same diet with added Vitamin A palmitate, a synthetic
form of A.
Although any
fats seemed to help, the effect was most pronounced with lard.14
This makes little sense given the seeming lack of Vitamin A in lard,
but a series of studies from the early 1950s identified the presence
of a "vitamin A replacing factor" in lard even when Vitamin A itself
was not detected.15-19
As we would
expect, the good fat in bacon comes accompanied by cholesterol,
a "no no" according to the Food Police, and yet another reason for
bacon's dangerous reputation.
The evidence
against cholesterol causing or contributing to heart disease, of
course, is inconsistent, contradictory, misinterpreted and sparse.
It's oxidized cholesterol as found in the powdered milk and
powdered egg ingredients used for processed, packaged and fast foods,
including low-fat and non-fat milks that contributes to heart
disease. What's more, as biochemical textbooks make clear, cholesterol
is the mother of all hormones, including our reproductive and mood
hormones.20
Thus bacon's cholesterol content may be part of the reason it enjoys
such a reputation as a "feel good" food.
The Heart
of the Matter
Even so, "everyone
knows" bacon's bad for us, and Dr. Barnard would have us think it's
a veritable risk factor for heart disease. In fact, bacon might
be good for the heart. And not just because it makes us happy, though
that's surely a plus! Monounsaturated fat the primary
fat in bacon is widely lauded for reducing inflammation and
lowering blood pressure, while the antimicrobial palmitoleic content
in bacon fat can keep plaque at bay. Triglycerides too may improve
because bacon fat is especially good at helping us achieve satiety
and stable blood sugar. Bacon can thus be useful for diabetics and
prediabetics as well as everyone else coping with sugar cravings
and carbohydrate addictions.
Promoting bacon
as a red hot ticket to weight loss might seem over the top, but
eggs and bacon do add up to a high-fat, high-protein and low-carb
breakfast. They not only help people start their day feeling happy,
but can reduce hunger pains and rev the metabolism. For many people,
bacon's signature salty and savory sweetness is a treat that reduces
feelings of deprivation and lack. It can help people transition
away from high carb diets and overcome carb addictions. And by stabilizing
blood sugar, bacon helps prevent mood swings, reduce anxiety, improve
focus and enhance coping skills.
Salt of the
Earth
Those not worried
about bacon's fat and cholesterol content often fret about the salt.
Sodium restriction, of course, is the latest goal of the Food Police
despite underwhelming evidence that salt contributes to high blood
pressure and heart disease. In fact, Americans today eat about half
the salt they consumed during the good old days prior to refrigeration
when meat and fish were preserved by salting and curing, and vegetables
by culturing and pickling.
Animals seek
out salt licks, paleo people eat and drink salty blood and other
animal parts, and biochemists point out we need sodium and chloride
for blood, sweat, tears, mucus and semen. Textbooks "worth their
salt" make all of this abundantly clear, yet U.S. government guidelines
recommend drastic reductions in salt intake.
Sadly, low-salt
diets increase the likelihood of heart disease, hypertension, cognitive
decline, osteoporosis, insulin resistance and erectile dysfunction.21-22
Given today's epidemic of chronic illness, that's pouring salt on
a gaping healthcare wound! And it's a poor reason indeed to avoid
bacon.
Fear of Nitrites
For members
of the Weston A. Price Foundation, the big issue is not fear of
fat, cholesterol or salt, but fear of nitrites, which have been
associated with cancer and many other ills. Indeed studies
such as the recent one out of Harvard – make the headlines so often
that nearly all educated, health conscious consumers think they
should either avoid processed meats altogether or choose "uncured
bacons" that are advertised as "nitrite free." Popular brands assumed
to be healthy include Niman, Bieler, Applegate, Coleman's and nearly
every other bacon brand found at Whole Foods Market or other health
food stores. The question is, are these "uncured" bacons healthier?
Deceiving
the Public
The short answer
is no. Nathan S. Bryan, PhD, University of Texas Houston Biomedical
Research Center, pulls no punches when he states, "This notion of
'nitrite-free' or 'organically cured' meats is a public deception."23Traditionally
bacon was cured by adding sodium nitrite salts directly to the meat.
Today most manufacturers of "nitrite free" brands add celery salt,
which is about 50 percent nitrate, plus a starter culture of bacteria.
This transforms the nitrate found naturally in the celery salt into
nitrite, which cures the meat.
Although manufacturers
label this bacon "nitrite free," this method actually generates
more nitrite from the celery salt than would ever be added as a
salt. Indeed, "nitrite free" bacon can have twice the nitrite content
of bacons cured directly with nitrite salts. "Some convert 40 percent,
some convert 90 percent, so the consistency of the residual nitrite
is highly variable," Dr. Bryan says. Yet his biggest concern
is not nitrite content but the possibility of bacterial contamination.
"I think it is probably less healthy than regular cured meats because
of the bacteria load and the unknown efficacy of conversion by the
bacteria," he says.24
Nitrites were
used traditionally to preserve food safely, including cured meat
and fish, as well as some cheeses. Although improved hygiene and
availability of refrigeration diminishes the need for nitrite, it
remains useful for its antioxidant properties, antimicrobial activity,
flavor enhancement and color development.25-31
Modern alternatives
such as biological acidulants, parabens and sorbates are FDA approved
and generally considered safe. Yet biological acidulants such as
sodium and potassium bisulfates have been linked to respiratory
problems, including lung irritation and coughing,32
and parabens are significant endocrine disrupters, with the potential
to adversely affect the fertility and sex lives of both men and
women.33
As for sorbates, the mainstream media only warns us about an association
with contact dermatitis34
Older studies,
however, suggested mutagenic sorbate and nitrite reactions.35-36
Biochemist Galen D. Knight, PhD, is sufficiently concerned to exclude
them from his diet: "The sorbates and parasorbates are essentially
polyunsaturated fats capable of forming both epoxides and enols,
which are carcinogens. The 'bates should not be in our food supply
if we want to remain healthy." 37
The Bacon
Cure
Could it be
our ancestors were right after all? That today's new, improved and
supposedly healthy versions of bacon are not? The traditional
way to make bacon is dry cured through hand rubbing with a mixture
of herbs, sugars, salt, and the sodium nitrite curing salts. Vitamin
C in the mix helps form the nitrosylheme pigment that gives cured
meats their wonderful red color, and, as will be explained shortly,
helps ensure nitrites convert to healthy nitric oxide and not carcinogenic
nitrosamines.
Traditional
producers leave the bacon to cure for anywhere from a day to a month
before slow-smoking it over applewood, hickory or other wood fires,
generally from one to three days. The extended curing time intensifies
the pork flavor and shrinks the meat so that the bacon doesn't shrivel
and splatter as it cooks.
Flavor can
vary quite a bit from producer to producer, and is determined by
the ingredients of the cure, the method of smoking, and the timing.
The age, gender, and breed of the pig, as well as its time outdoors,
forage and feed all influence the final flavor of the bacon as well
as its potential for health benefits or risks.
Dirty Little
Secrets
Supermarket
bacon may also use sodium nitrite, but not in a traditional way.
Instead, manufacturers opt for fast and cheap methods by which inferior
quality factory-farmed meat is pumped and plumped with a liquid
cure solution that includes sodium erythorbate and sodium nitrite,
along with "liquid smoke," spices and flavorings heavy in MSG. After
"curing" for a few hours, the pork is sprayed with more "liquid
smoke" and heated until a smoke-like flavor permeates the meat.
The pork is then quickly chilled, machine-pressed into a uniform
shape, sliced, and packaged for sale. Pumped and plumped bacon may
look big in the package, but shrinks, shrivels and splatters when
cooked.
"Liquid smoke,"
a product heavily favored by big food manufacturers, is produced
by burning wood chips or sawdust, then condensing the smoke into
solids or liquids and dissolving it in water. It is being investigated
by the European Food Safety Authority for safety as a food flavoring
because of evidence of genotoxicity and cytotoxicity. Indeed, one
study suggests liquid smoke is more carcinogenic than cigarette
smoke concentrate.38-41
Concerns about
Nitrite
Concerns about
the safety of nitrite first surfaced in the 1960s when studies showed
the presence of carcinogenic nitrosamines in bacon and other cured
meat products. In the early 1970s, researchers at the Massachusetts
Institute of Technology implicated nitrite itself as a carcinogen.
The MIT study involved direct feeding of nitrite to laboratory rats,
and later studies did not support the headline-making conclusion
that nitrite induces cancer. The USDA's concern then shifted to
the formation of nitrosamines from nitrite combining with the amines
available in meat, with regulators weighing the possible risk of
cancer against nitrite's traditional and well-proven role protecting
us from botulism and other forms of food poisoning. 42
Since then
commercial bacon has been heavily studied and subject to regulatory
monitoring of nitrosamine levels. Although nitrosamines have been
found in many cured meats, they are most consistently found in fried
bacon.43-50A
look at the research, however, shows it to be inconsistent, contradictory
and confusing.
Over the years,
most scientists have blamed the nitrosamines on frying although
some data suggest nitrosamines can be produced as an artifact during
the analytical procedure whenever residual nitrite is present.51.
Wood smoke has also been blamed though the culprit might actually
be "liquid smoke."52
In 1973 the
Canadian Department of Agriculture found preformed nitrosamines
in the readymade spice mixes favored by Big Ag bacon processors
as well as many of the smaller producers. After the USDA confirmed
the Canadian findings, regulators made these spice mixes illegal.53The
USDA also soon required the use of sodium erythorbates and/ or ascorbates
in bacon processing after consistent research findings indicated
these substances pushed nitrosamine levels way down.54
Obviously some
of the nitrosamine problem stems from industrial processing. The
USDA may have outlawed certain spice mixes back in the 1970s, but
preformed nitrosamines might well exist in the latest generation
of artificial and "natural" flavorings and "liquid smokes." Also
worrisome are references to "meat batters" and to high pressure,
high temperature processing methods known to produce nitrosamines
and routinely used to produce commercial bacon.
Choosing dry
cured or "country style" bacon made by small producers would seem
to be a safer option, but in some instances might generate even
higher levels of N-nitrosopyrrolidine (NPYR) after frying compared
to pump-cured bacon.55
The problem is processing methods vary widely, with different choices
and concentrations of spices, sodium nitrite and sometimes sodium
nitrate. The USDA now recommends that processors not add sodium
nitrate because it is not necessary and the conversion of nitrate
to nitrite is variable and somewhat unpredictable.
Fat in the
Feeds
From the WAPF
point of view, the most interesting and helpful findings concern
the effect of fatty acid composition on nitrosamine formation. After
all, factory-farmed pigs routinely eat feeds that include soy, corn
and other inferior oils while pastured pigs should not.
In 1984, researchers
discovered that bacon from pigs fed corn oil-supplemented diets
contains significantly higher levels of the nitrosamines n-nitrosopyrrolidine
and n-nitrosodimethylamine compared to controls. They also reported
that bacon from pigs fed a coconut fat-supplemented diet contains
significantly lower levels of n-nitrosopyrrolidine but no significant
difference in n-nitrosodimethylamine levels compared to controls.
Given that
the controls were fed a standard commercial corn and soy-based diet
supplemented with vitamins and minerals, we can only wonder what
might be found with bacon sourced from optimally nourished, pastured
pigs. Be that as it may, one of the researchers' conclusions is
telling: "Fatty acid analyses of the adipose tissue of the bacon
samples indicated that n-nitrosopyrrolidine levels in bacon correlated
well with the degree of unsaturation of the adipose tissue."56
Other research supports the connection between nitrosamine formation
and the fatty acid profiles of animal feed and meat. Nitrosamines,
show up more frequently in the fat than in the lean.57-59
The takeaway
is clear: choose bacon from pastured pigs.
That said,
finding genuine, traditionally cured artisanal bacon is just about
impossible. The anti-nitrite message has penetrated so deeply that
most artesanal farmers produce their bacon using the dry salt way
but without added nitrites, relying on salt, good sanitary practices
and refrigeration to prevent contamination. In the days prior to
refrigeration, of course, the sodium nitrite step was not an option.
This type of "no added nitrate or nitrates" products are honest
compared to the newfangled celery salt "uncured" bacons, and are
obviously far healthier than supermarket pumped and plumped bacon-like
products, or the fakin' bacons from turkey or soy.
That said,
there is probably nothing wrong with a good old-fashioned bacon
cured with a precise amount of sodium nitrite curing salts. If the
idea of nitrite still seems scary, consider this: Ascorbic acid
is routinely added to cured meats along with the nitrite in order
to promote beneficial nitric oxide formation from nitrite, and to
inhibit nitrosation reactions in the stomach that can lead to carcinogenic
nitrosamines. Bringing alpha tocopherol (Vitamin E) into the mix
as well seems to further prevent occurrence of nitrosamine formation.60-63
Old-fashioned processing, involving leisurely time for curing and
smoking, further enhances the conversion of nitrite to the beneficial
nitric oxide molecule.
Just Say "NO"
In 1998 Robert
F. Furchgott, Louis J. Ignarro and Ferid Murad won the Nobel prize
in physiology and medicine for their discovery of nitric oxide (NO)
as a signaling molecule in the cardiovascular system. As the first
molecule discovered that can literally communicate with other molecules,
nitric oxide revolutionized conventional scientific thinking.64
In terms of
preventing heart disease, nitric oxide produced by the cells in
our blood vessels signals the surrounding arterial tissues to tell
them to relax. That lowers blood pressure, expands narrow blood
vessels, eliminates dangerous clots, and reduces the formation of
plaque. Interestingly enough, NO lowers triglyceride levels, but
not cholesterol, and researchers even report that NO even seems
to protect those with high cholesterol. WAPF thinking, of course,
holds that NO's failure to lower cholesterol is a point in its favor,
as cholesterol has many benies and no protection against high cholesterol
is needed.
By optimizing
circulation, NO affects every part of the body. More blood flow
means better oxygen transfer and more energy. More blood flow means
better brain function and better attention. And more blood flow
means a better sex life.
Accordingly,
NO is a key ingredient in many well-known erectile dysfunction products.
Nitric oxide also benefits the immune system, where it helps us
fight off infections, and the nervous system where it helps our
brain cells communicate properly. NO's myriad health benefits are
summed up in the popular book TheNitric Oxide (NO)
Solution by Nathan S.Bryan, PhD and Janet Zand, OMD.65
Although the book does not contain citations, a quick PubMed search
reveals Dr. Bryan's contribution to at least 88 journal articles,
many establishing the NO benefits described above.
NO for Life
The message
is NO is vital for a long, healthy and vital life. Unfortunately,
few people today produce enough NO for optimal health, and NO deficiencies
have been identified in many chronic diseases. Although NO supplements
have been developed and marketed, and might well be helpful for
people on plant-based, low-fat, low-cholesterol diets, such products
might not be needed with a return to traditional foods. Traditionally
cured bacon, sausage and other meats cured with sodium nitrite might
be just the ticket to increasing NO production in the body.
Another big
NO producing food is beets, suggesting yet another reason why so
many WAPFers thrive on beet kvaas. Although foods rich in the amino
acids citrulline and arginine are often recommended to increase
NO production, most people are not young enough or healthy enough
to turn that trick. Perhaps the more direct route from nitrite to
NO is the way to go.
Nitrites and
the Nitrogen Cycle
But aren't
nitrates and nitrites dangerous? Yes, and no. Nitrates are
natural products of the nitrogen cycle and found in water, plants
and animals. Approximately 80 percent of dietary nitrates are derived
from vegetable consumption, and nitrites are naturally present in
saliva, in the gut and indeed in all mammalian tissue.66
Clearly, we cannot be pro plant based diet and anti nitrates!
Levels of nitrite
naturally increase in the body to help boost oxygen when people
live at high altitudes, and such people are often considered among
the healthiest in the world.67
In short, nitrites are not a problem, provided our diets are rich
enough in antioxidants to facilitate the conversion of nitrites
to NO and to prevent nitrosation reactions that convert nitrites
into carcinogenic nitrosamines.
It's obviously
important to avoid eating readymade sources of nitrosamines, such
as those that occur in soy protein isolates, non-fat dry milk and
other products that have undergone acid washes, flame drying or
high temperature spray-drying processes.68-70
People are also exposed to nitrosamines from some types of beer,
cigarettes, nipples of baby bottles and the rubber used with braces
in orthodontics.71-72
In other words,
nitrosamines don't just come from cured meats. Furthermore,
the nitrosamine content in cured meats has gone way down over the
past few decades.72
As for environmental damage from nitrates, this problem comes from
the land use abuses of factory farming.
Bring Home
the Bacon
Then why do
so many health experts condemn bacon and other cured meats because
of their nitrite content? Well, why do fats and cholesterol still
get a bum rap?
The reason
is bad studies and worse publicity, with the latest shoddy work
out of Harvard a prime example. According to Dr. Bryan, the body
of studies show only a "weak association" with evidence that is
"inconclusive." As he and his colleagues wrote in the American
Journal of Clinical Nutrition, "This paradigm needs revisiting
in the face of undisputed health benefits of nitrite- and nitrate-enriched
diets."73So
what's the last word on America's favorite meat? Indulge bacon lust
freely, know that the science is catching up, the media lags behind,
and, our ancestors most likely got it right.
Weston Price
Organization
Without a doubt
the premiere organization in the United States connecting individuals
to the farmers that are producing the healthiest food is Weston
Price. They have hundreds of chapters throughout the country
that are likely not to far from where you live. You can contact
a chapter leader near you, and they can help you identify local
resources to provide you and your family with health food that is
grown locally.
About
the Author
Kaayla
T. Daniel, PhD, CCN, is the Naughty Nutritionist™ because of her
ability tooutrageously and humorously debunk nutritional
myths A popular guest on radio and television, she has been on The
Dr Oz Show, NPR's People's Pharmacy and PBS Healing Quest.
Dr Daniel is the author of The Whole Soy Story: The Dark Side of
America's Favorite Health Food, a popular speaker at Wise Traditions,
Biosignature, National Association of Nutritional Professionals
and other conferences, Vice President of the Weston A. Price Foundation
and recipient of its 2005 Integrity in Science Award. Her websites
are www.naughtynutritionist.comand
www.wholesoystory.com.