"They
had their entire lives ahead of them – birthdays, graduations, weddings,
kids of their own," intoned
the murderer of 16-year-old Abdulrahman al-Awlaki as he began the
liturgy of official mourning for the victims of the Newtown massacre.
Every time
children die in an outbreak of violence, "I react not as a
president, but as anybody else would as a parent," continued
the head of a regime that will not explain to Nasser
al-Awlaki why his son Anwar and grandson Abdulrahman – both
of the U.S. citizens – were murdered by presidential decree.
"We’ve
endured too many of these tragedies in the past few years,"
insisted the official who has presided over dozens of lethal drone
attacks in Pakistan and other countries with whom the U.S. is not
formally at war.
Obama wiped
away a non-existent tear as he pronounced the familiar, facile phrases
of selective sympathy. After ordering that U.S. flags be flown at
half-staff for a week, Obama said that he and his wife would hug
their children a little closer tonight as he empathizes with the
parents whose children were murdered in Newtown.
It’s doubtful
that he was moved to similar thoughts of vicarious bereavement as
he contemplated the parents in Pakistan, Yemen, and Afghanistan
who have been left childless because of his actions.
Shortly after
the police had arrived at Sandy Hook Elementary School to offer
the service they always provide in such circumstances – that is,
drawing chalk outlines and stringing up crime-scene tape – Mr. Obama
was informed of the massacre. The minion who conveyed that news
to the Child Killer-in-Chief was National Security Adviser John
Brennan, who is the official Keeper of the "Kill List"
– the roster of people, including U.S. citizens, who have been targeted
for summary execution by a secretive executive branch committee.
Last April,
in response to modest but growing public outrage over the Obama
Regime’s use of killer drones, Brennan
gave an opaque and self-congratulatory speech insisting that
the program was legal because those who preside over it consider
it to be.
Killing distant,
unarmed people by way of robot-delivered missiles is "legal,
ethical, and wise," he declared. The targeted execution of
individuals deemed to be terrorists –without the benefit of trial
or any simulacrum of due process – is the result of careful "deliberation,"
and conducted in a way that discriminates between combatants and
bystanders.
This must mean
that Barack Obama and the people who are sufficiently foolish and
depraved to obey his orders intended to kill 16-year-old Abdulrahman
al-Awlaki while he was enjoying a backyard barbecue at the home
of a family friend in Yemen.
The Regime
has never explained why it murdered that child, let alone apologized
to the family for doing so. The closest it has come to an explanation
was offered
last September by former White House spokesliar (and campaign functionary)
Robert Gibbs, who actually claimed that the teenager’s death was
his own fault because he had somehow made a poor choice of fathers:
"I would suggest that you should have a far more responsible
father if they’re truly concerned about the well-being of their
children."
By default,
this is the Obama Regime’s official rationale for murdering an innocent
16-year-old U.S. citizen. How does the logic – such as it is – of
Gibbs’s answer differ from whatever rationale drove a maniac
to open fire on a kindergarten class in Connecticut? Assuming that
the shooter was deranged, he at least had the excuse of insanity.
Obama, Brennan,
Gibbs and their allies, by way of contrast, all profess to be entirely
sane. The same is true of Time magazine contributor – and
prominent Obama supporter – Joe Klein. Late in the last campaign
Klein used an MSNBC panel discussion to offer a stout defense of
Obama’s drone strikes, even as he admitted that innocent bystanders
– including 4-year-olds – are frequently killed by them. The only
concern, Klein insisted, was the possibility that the power to conduct
remote killings may find itself in the hands of someone less enlightened
than Obama.
For the Obama
Regime, child-killing is an instrument of policy. This was made
clear in a recent story reported by the Military Times describing
how U.S. troops in Afghanistan, fearful over the actions of a group
of young men nearby called in an airstrike that killed all of the
suspected guerillas – only to find out later that three of them
were children, aged 8, 10, and 12. The families of the dead children
said that they had been gathering dried animal leavings, which are
used as fuel.
The International
Security Assistance Force in Kabul issued a statement acknowledging
that the airstrike "accidentally killed three innocent Afghan
children." That statement prompted Army Lt. Col. Marion Carrington
to tell the
Military Times that the children may not have been innocent.
According to
Carrington, whose unit is training Afghan police, "In addition
to looking for military-age males, [we are] looking for children
with potential hostile intent." Since hostility is the natural,
and entirely commendable, reaction to foreign occupiers, Carrington
is saying that any Afghan child with sufficient awareness to resent
the occupation is a legitimate military target.
What Adam Lanza
did once in a fit of murderous irrationality, the Regime over which
Obama presides does practically every day – and the killing is carried
out by people who act with clear-eyed, clinical indifference to
the suffering they inflict.
Admittedly,
that comparison is unfair, since Lanza didn’t have the means to
carry out an Obama-style "double-tap"
strike: It is the established practice of the CIA to follow
up a drone-launched missile attack with a second volley intended
to target first responders. In Pakistan, this procedure has resulted
in a ratio of fifty innocent victims for every "suspected militant"
taken out in a drone strike.
The killer
who slaughtered the innocent at Sandy Hook is dead. The Child-Killing
Apparatus over which Obama presides continues merrily along. Americans
understandably shaken and saddened to the depth of their souls by
the horrors in Newtown should consider this: The government that
impudently presumes to rule us has made Sandy Hook-style massacres
routine for residents of Pakistan.