Roxana Saberi's Plight and American Media Propaganda
by Glenn Greenwald
by
Glenn Greenwald
An Iranian
appeals court this
morning announced that it was reducing the sentence and ordering
the immediate release of Iranian-American journalist Roxana
Saberi, who was convicted by an Iranian court last month of spying
for the U.S. and sentenced to eight years in prison. Saberi's
imprisonment in January became a cause célèbre among American
journalists, who along with the U.S. Government
rallied to demand her release. Within minutes of the announcement,
several of them including ABC News'
Jake Tapper, Time's
Karen Tumulty, The Atlantic's
Marc Ambinder posted celebratory notices of Saberi's
release.
Saberi's release
is good news, as her conviction occurred as part of extremely
dubious charges and unreliable judicial procedures in Iran.
And, as Ambinder suggested, her release most likely is a positive
by-product of the commendable
(though
far from perfect) change in tone towards Iran specifically and
the Muslim world generally from the Obama administration.
But imprisoning journalists without charges or trials of
any kind was and continues to be a staple of America's "war
on terror," and that has provoked virtually no objections from America's
journalists who, notably, instead seized on Saberi's plight in Iran
to demonstrate their claimed commitment to defending persecuted
journalists.
Beginning in
2001, the U.S. held
Al Jazeera cameraman Sami al-Haj for six years
in Guantanamo with no trial of any kind, and spent
most of that time interrogating him not about Terrorism, but
about Al Jazeera. For virtually the entire time, the
due-process-less, six-year-long imprisonment of this journalist
by the U.S. produced almost no coverage let alone any outcry
from America's establishment media, other than some
columns by Nicholas Kristof (though, for years, al-Haj's
imprisonment was a major media story in the Muslim world). As
Kristof
noted when al-Haj was finally released in 2007: "there
was never any real evidence that Sami was anything but a journalist";
"the interrogators quickly gave up on asking him substantive questions"
and "instead, they asked him to spy on Al-Jazeera if he was released;"
and "American officials, by imprisoning an Al-Jazeera journalist
without charges or meaningful evidence, have done far more to damage
American interests in the Muslim world than anything Sami could
ever have done."
In Iraq, we
imprisoned Associated Press photographer Bilal Hussein
part of AP's Pulitzer Prize-winning war coverage
for almost two years with no charges of any kind,
after Hussein's photographs from the Anbar province directly contradicted
Bush administration claims about the state of affairs there.
And that behavior was far from aberrational for the U.S., as
the Committee to Protect Journalists which led the effort
to free Saberi documented:
Hussein's
detention is not an isolated incident. Over the last three years,
dozens of journalists—mostly Iraqis—have been
detained by U.S. troops, according to CPJ research. While
most have been released after short periods, in at least
eight cases documented by CPJ Iraqi journalists have been held
by U.S. forces for weeks or months without charge or conviction.
In one highly publicized case, Abdul Ameer Younis Hussein, a freelance
cameraman working for CBS, was detained after being wounded by
U.S. military fire as he filmed clashes in Mosul in northern Iraq
on April 5, 2005. U.S. military officials claimed footage in his
camera led them to suspect Hussein had prior knowledge of attacks
on coalition forces. In April 2006, a year after his arrest, Hussein
was freed after an Iraqi criminal court, citing a lack of evidence,
acquitted him of collaborating with insurgents.
Right now
as the American press corps celebrates itself for demanding
Saberi's release in Iran the U.S. continues
to imprison Ibrahim Jassam, a freelance photographer for Reuters,
even though an Iraqi court last December more than five months
ago found
that there was no evidence to justify his detention and ordered
him released. The U.S. over the objections
of the CPJ, Reporters Without Borders and Reuters refused
to recognize the validity of that Iraqi court order and announced
it would continue to keep him imprisoned.
One finds only
a tiny fraction of news coverage in the U.S. regarding the treatment
of al-Haj, Hussein, Jassam and these other imprisoned journalists
as has been devoted to Saberi. It ought to be exactly the
reverse: the American media should be far more interested
in, and opposed to, infringements of press freedoms by the U.S.
Government than by governments of other countries. Yet
the former merits hardly a peep, while the latter provokes all sorts
of smug and self-righteous protests from American journalists who
suddenly discover their brave commitment to press freedoms when
all that requires is pointing to a demonized, hated foreign government
and complaining.
Read
the rest of the article
|