Bypassing
Government Roadblocks to Your Personal Prosperity
by
David Galland
Casey
Research
Recently
by David Galland: The
Golden Constant
Recently I
helped out with some delivery chores. As I drove about, I discovered
that one of the roads I would normally use was closed by roadblocks.
It was, I imagine, due to road repair work. I had to reverse course
and take a substantial detour.
I wondered
why the road crew hadn't put up a sign indicating the road was closed
back at the main intersection, but I shrugged and muttered something
like "Typical government operation."
Driving back
home, this idea of roadblocks took root in my mind. The thing is,
only governmental entities can set up roadblocks – at least, legally.
Obviously,
there are times when such roadblocks are entirely appropriate...
for example, when a bridge is found to be dangerous.
In that case,
putting up a roadblock to let drivers know that the road is a no-go
makes perfect sense.
For example,
a temporary warning sign to let people know that there is a road
crew fixing potholes ahead makes sense and that sort of thing.
Otherwise,
unless a road is damaged to the point where driving is either impossible
or ill advised, there should be no roadblocks set up. Makes sense,
right?
The
decision to set up a roadblock should be taken only by people who
are close to the problem, who understand the issues, and can deal
with the problem on the road, fix it, and open it up again as quickly
as possible.
Imagine then
a world where government officials, as often as not operating hundreds
or even thousands of miles away, are in control of the roadblock
rules.
Despite having
no real knowledge of the problem at a local level, they dictate
that those roadblocks be set up and made permanent based not upon
the specific condition that a road is out, but rather based on political
expediency, cronyism, imaginary threats, and donations by influential
lobbyists.
In a world
like that, where roadblocks are set up all over the place and without
any real thought to the consequences to road users, imagine how
difficult it could be to get from Point A to Point B.
In fact, it
would not be out of the question that the single road leading to
your house could be blocked, leaving you no way out.
While that
seems rather extreme, I would contend that it is a valid metaphor
for the world we now live in.
To make the
point, a couple of weeks ago, I discussed my recent
travels to Ireland and Portugal and the devastating consequences
the actions of the European central planners have had on those economies.
Before the
European Commission bulldozed their way of life, the Portuguese
fishermen made a nice living. They made money and supported their
families the same way they had for generations. Life was good.
But not long
after Portugal's admission into the Eurozone, however, they woke
up one morning to discover their own regulatory roadblock.
It was cooked
up by bureaucrats thousands of miles away who have no idea of the
local challenges or hazards it would bring to the local economy
and the families that rely on it.
This
roadblock required them under law to destroy their fishing
boats, thereby preventing them from earning their livelihoods.
Another example
of roadblock insanity can be seen in energy policy here in the US.
Hollow
Sound Bytes and Pointless Platitudes
Politicians
bray about the need for energy independence.
Behind the
scenes, however, they kowtow to the environoids and special interests
by littering the landscape with roadblocks that prevent energy companies
from achieving and innovating our way to exactly the independence
they tell us we must have at all costs!
Here's
where it affects you:
Government
has set up another sizable roadblock. This time it is in the path
of savers.
By meddling
in the market in order to allow the debt-bloated government to continue
its out-of-control spending, the Fed has suppressed interest rates
to the lowest levels in US history.
Almost overnight,
retirees and others who counted on the yields earned on savings
to cover living costs have come to a dead stop in front of a roadblock
placed in the way of their most pressing needs.
Their
finances now in tatters, even people in their 70s who have worked
hard and saved all their lives are being reduced to serving up French
fries at fast-food joints.
For another
roadblock, look no further than Obamacare.
In a recent
Reason magazine article, it also expressed the same sort
of convoluted logic that has gone into creating a series of related
roadblocks. As one wit put it:
"If
you think health care is expensive today, wait until it's free."
One of those
roadblocks has to do with the considerably higher taxes tucked away
in reams of unreadable legalese that will shift yet more funding
from the private sector to the public. Here's the text from an email
sent to Doug Casey by a financial professional friend of his this
week:
You
may have had only a casual interest in the debate over the Obama
Health Care bill, and even if you followed it closely, the headline
discussion seemed to be more on the inclusion of millions of uninsured
citizens, the penalties for not being insured, etc., vs. the fact
that this is a noticeable income tax increase on investment income.
For
those who have an adjusted gross income of $200k ($250k for joint
returns) or more, the number on the bottom of the first page of
your 1040, which comes before itemized deductions, charitable gifts,
or personal exemptions, there is a +3.8% uncapped tax applied on
all investment income (capital gains, interest, dividends, etc.),
plus an obscure provision of the code known as the Pease, which
reduces the value of itemized deductions, adding another +1.2% to
the tax rate.
Be
aware that if the current "Bush tax cuts" are not extended, the
current long-term capital gains tax rate of 15% will go up by two-thirds
to 25% beginning 1/1/2013. The top rate on dividends will nearly
triple from 15% to 44.6%!! Ouch.
Unlike
Social Security taxes, which are capped, the Health Care tax is
uncapped. The mouthy Warren Buffett is finally getting his wish
– paying more than a 15% tax rate. Instead of just writing a check
for more, which he is certainly welcome to do, as an advisor to
the administration, he probably had some influence on getting it
applied to all higher-income Americans.
As
you know, I am not a tax attorney nor an accountant, so am sending
this as a heads-up, and if it is relevant to you, you should confirm
the details with your tax advisors.
On the topic
of throwing up more tax roadblocks, here's one from overseas… sent
along in an email from our own Vedran Vuk. In Vedran's own words…
"Most
of the time when we think about raising taxes, it's the threat of
millionaires leaving. We don't usually think about them not coming
to a country. Here's an interesting case of Zlatan Ibrahimovic signing
a soccer contract for 14 million euros per year. If the new tax
goes through in France, he will be taxed for 75% over the first
million euros. If the tax does go through, good luck attracting
multimillion-earning players to France. A lot of people in the 99%
will be pretty unhappy when all of their sports teams become horrible
as a result of the tax."
My favorite
quote from the article is:
"Ibrahimovic
will earn 14 million euros annually, sports daily L'Equipe reported.
Sports Minister Valerie Fourneyron said that indicates that European
football needs more regulation."
Yes,
just what the world needs – more roadblocks.
Of course,
this time it's to block decisions that the football team's management
believes it needs to make in order to win (and therefore attract
fans, sell tickets, and raise rates to sponsors).
Insane.
I recently
ran into a public-high-school English teacher and asked how the
education business was going.
His response
was, "Do you have four days for me to tell you all that's wrong?"
"It
seems like every month some team or another shows up from the government
in order to introduce a new teaching program. And the really frustrating
thing, is that none of these people has ever taught school."
He went on
to say that it becomes clear very quickly that they have no idea
what they're talking about and that each new protocol was conceived
by some bureaucrat with no teaching experience either.
It was eye-opening
to hear such emotive language from a public-high-school teacher
– in my experience, most of the people who choose that profession
are largely on board with the whole big-government thing.
Yet, it seems
that more and more people are beginning to catch on to the idea
that central planning is not such a great idea.
It's how you
end up with roadblocks where roadblocks don't belong.
It's how you
end up on a road you never intended to travel along, forced there
by roadblocks that don't make sense and clearly don't help.
Ultimately
you risk getting hopelessly lost, or you turn around go back the
way you came and start again.
So yet another
school program gets introduced, another law, another rule. And it
all starts again.
Happily,
it is almost a certainty that, in time, the bureaucrats and their
many roadblocks will be shoved aside.
I say that
because there really is a limit to how long people will put up with
being denied access to their fundamental rights of life, liberty,
and the pursuit of happiness.
There is only
so long that entrepreneurs will put up with having to navigate around
more and more roadblocks in order to provide a product or service
to consumers, when such roadblocks serve absolutely no useful purpose.
Unfortunately,
while there are a number of things
you can do to get started and plenty of sound advice along the
way, it will take time.
That's because
there is still a considerable swath of the voting public who actually
buys into the idea that government is a force for good and that
without it, equality and justice would go by the wayside.
And so it is
that the US and virtually all of the large economies around the
world are still firmly in the grip of the notion that central planning
is the only way to get to the green pastures that surely must be
just over the next hill.
Or, more specifically,
the next round of legislation and policy machinations (read "roadblocks").
There has never
been a starker example of the mindset of the current administration
and its many followers than a comment made by President Obama this
week. Here it is:
"If
you've got a business, you didn't build that.
Somebody else made that happen."
His point is
that essentially, all human progress is due to the good work of
governments.
- That without
governments, there would be no roads to set up roadblocks on.
- There would
be no Internet.
- There would
be no body of case law nor a judicial system to enforce that law.
- There would
be no telephones.
I disagree,
and
so do many others – including many from past governments who
see the direction Washington, DC is taking and don't like it.
I contend that
this view of the world is essentially the opposite of the tenets
of the capitalist/free-market model.
In
the view of Mr. Obama and his ilk, We the Sheeple are all but helpless
without the government to lead us forward.
That the US
government's activities as a share of GDP have gone from well under
10% at the beginning of the last century to over 40% today – and
will go over 50% by the time Obamacare is fully implemented – makes
it clear that this country is now operating on principles that run
completely contrary to those that promote success and economic well-being.
The consequence
of continuing to operate on this model will be a steady decline
in the quality of life for most Americans, while favoring a ruling
elite that produces nothing… except more roadblocks.
Ayn Rand will
someday be celebrated as a futurist.
But how does
one fight back? Grab a gun? Don't even think about it: the Second
Amendment may have been intended to protect against a tyrannical
government, but the actual truth is that the weaponry of the US
government is so incredibly advanced at this point that even the
most well-armed militia wouldn't last a minute.
No, the best
way to "fight back" is to get wise to the whole thing.
Understanding
what's happening and knowing where the roadblocks are likely to
be just makes sense.
And having
clearly set out strategies that both sidestep the roadblocks and
preserve your wealth is not just a good idea – it's critical.
The upcoming
Casey Research conference, Navigating
the Politicized Economy, will give its attendees a real
sense of both knowledge and preparation.
The speaker
lineup is a "who's who" of investment success, and each brings a
world of experience to the event.
Among the confirmed
faculty are former US Comptroller General David Walker; The
Creature from Jekyll Island author G. Edward Griffin; Karl
Denninger, author of The
Market Ticker; and Mauldin Economics Chairman John Mauldin.
The early-bird registration discount ends on July 31, so grab
your seat now.
July 30, 2012
David Galland
is the managing editor of Casey
Research.
Copyright
© 2012 Casey
Research
The
Best of David Galland
|