Obama
to Government Motors: 'Let's Roll'
by
Karen De Coster
by Karen De Coster
The last remnants
of the American free-market system are experiencing a quick death
by strangulation. Perhaps the most disturbing casualties of government
intervention are General Motors and Chrysler, two disgraced automakers
that have gone from private ownership to the public trough virtually
overnight. The US government has effectively grabbed a financial
stake in each company while attempting to control the reorganization
process without any constitutional authority to commence such actions.
The takeovers,
which have occurred at breakneck speed, are alarming. A defining
characteristic of economic fascism is the control of private property
and business through a government-business "partnership."
This public-private alliance, while permitting private business
ownership, is an arrangement that allows government to control and
plan private industry. What we are experiencing from the schemers
in Washington, DC is a planned capitalism, or soft fascism, that
is being rolled out at an unprecedented pace.
One of the
more disturbing actions on the part of the Washington establishment
has been the blatant disregard for property and contract rights.
First, consider the case of Chrysler. The government, while coming
to the aid of a dying Chrysler, lobbed offers to its lenders, the
bondholders. A group of dissident bondholders spurned the government's
offer that would have given them a minuscule stake in the company
while the UAW received a majority ownership position.
In response,
the president denounced the bondholders, publicly proclaiming their
obligation to sacrifice and referring to them as "vultures"
because they insisted on maintaining their rights as senior creditors.
Chrysler's bondholders, by law, are secured creditors, and they
hold a senior ranking above unsecured creditors or shareholders
in a bankruptcy or reorganization. Yet they were vilified and bullied
for refusing to agree to a shoddy deal. Some of the holdout bondholders
finally did buckle under; they dropped their legal challenge and
agreed to the government's lowball offer, but only because they
were strong-armed by Washington's bully tactics. Thomas Lauria,
the attorney representing the group, stated that his clients weren't
able to "withstand the enormous pressure and machinery of the
US government." Thus the senior creditors were plundered while
ownership was redistributed to the UAW, whose members are junior
creditors. This makes a mockery of US securities law.
The bailout
and ensuing appropriation of General Motors is no less tragic. The
current restructuring plan calls for the US Treasury Department
to have controlling interest in General Motors, which amounts to
absolute nationalization. In GM's headquarters in Detroit there
is a cluster of bureaucrats from the government's task force telling
GM how to run its business. The task force, assembled by the White
House, has the power to exercise significant control over product
decisions. According to a GM news release, the Treasury Department
will have the power to elect all of GM's directors and control the
vote on matters brought before the stockholders. Additionally, the
bondholders who have funded the company are being offered a paltry
piece of the equity of the reorganized company another major
blow against the sanctity of contract.
Furthermore,
the White House fired General Motors Chairman and CEO Rick Wagoner.
When the executive branch intervenes in a private business and ousts
management, bailout or not, it is a staggering violation of the
American ideal of free enterprise. This sets a precedent for unlimited
government trampling over the private sector. On March 30th, Obama
said, "Let me be clear. The United States government has
no interest in running GM. We have no intention of running GM."
If that's the case and we know it's not then why scoop
up majority ownership?
The revolving
door between Wall Street and the bowels of Washington are getting
a workout. It's the guys from Wall Street who run the government
and the guys from government who run Wall Street. Only the guys
from Wall Street especially Goldman Sachs who have taken over
the Treasury Department are now taking over control of the domestic
auto industry. You know what happened when they tried to run their
own company, Goldman Sachs. How in the heck did I miss the part
in the Constitution where powers were granted to the Treasury Department
and its hired hacks?
Another notable
abomination is the use of taxpayer dollars, on the part of the political
establishment, to grant preferential treatment to one group of constituents
the unions at the expense of each company's creditors,
the bondholders. Not only is this an illicit use of the executive
office for political pandering, it's a deliberate redistribution
of wealth. It's also a handsome payoff to the loyal unions, who
have long been big supporters of the Democratic Party.
The GM and
Chrysler takeovers are orchestrated political restructurings aimed
at serving the larger interests of the US government. The apparatchiks
on the Potomac have the authority to coordinate production in a
manner that compliments their political and social agenda. The White
House has not been shy about its ambitions for green policy and
the future of American-made automobiles. This coup paves the way
for big government to get its tentacles into an industry that will
allow the feds to ram their socialist-totalitarian, green agenda
down all of our throats.
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Moreover, the
Obama regime already
announced that it
is buying 17,600 green vehicles (hybrid sedans) from Detroit's
Big Three by June 1, using $285 million from the $787 billion stimulus
bill. Representative Sander Levin, a Democrat from Michigan, stated,
"The federal government's purchase of thousands of hybrids
and other fuel-efficient vehicles from the Big Three shows that
our domestic auto industry will weather this current crisis and
build the cars of the future." But certainly, it shows nothing.
If the car companies were capable of building the cars of the future
that consumers want to buy, no bailout would have been needed, and
the government would not have to place an enormous, personal order
for automobiles in order to keep the assembly lines moving and inventory
lots turning over. The only thing the mega-purchase "shows"
is Detroit's inability to sell its automobiles at bloated prices
in the free market, thereby leaving the government to spend taxpayers'
money on goods they refused to buy on their own.
In fact, giving
the kiss of life to two dead horses, GM and Chrysler, illustrates
the futility at work here, considering that both companies have
just announced there will be a considerable number of dealership
closings all over the country. Chrysler plans to close about 800
dealerships while GM will trim back 2,600 dealers by 2010. The fact
that GM is cutting back its dealerships to the tune of 42 percent
speaks volumes about its bloated, bubble-fueled predicament. The
government has been pouring billions into each company's bailout
bin in order to keep these inefficient, surplus dealerships around
so that they could continue on their path of chasing invisible customers
and not selling cars. The misallocation of resources has been staggering.
Half-baked investment decisions, like these, are what we can expect
from a politically anointed task force that will centrally plan
the manufacture of automobiles.
As
the Chrysler resuscitation continues and GM morphs into Government
Motors, we can expect that the government will prepare to churn
out its environmentally correct greenmobiles that the market has
rejected over and over again. Freedom, choice, and capitalism will
pay a dear price because a group of government bureaucrats, on the
receiving end of political favors, will run a major sector of the
US economy and foist a prescribed lifestyle upon American consumers.
The funeral
bell is ringing a reminder of capitalism's mortality. And I won't
dare touch on what happens when government-run automobile manufacturers
perform like the post office or the DMV.
This article
originally appeared on Mises.org.
May
23, 2009
Karen
DeCoster [send her mail] is an accounting/finance
professional and writer. She rides a Harley, shoots lots of guns,
doesn't watch Oprah or Dr. Phil, and has never read a romance novel
or self-help psychobabble. She likes to grow vegetables, ride mountain
bikes, use her power washer, do cross-fit, and try new wines under
$15. She looks forward to the "Stars with Cellulite" editions
of the National Enquirer. Please do not forward her emails plastered
with little smiley faces and frivolous poems that end in, "Have
a Great Day!" This is her LewRockwell.com
archive and her Mises.org
archive. Check out her website,
along with her blog.

Karen
De Coster Archives
|