Who
Wants War With Iran?
by
Patrick
J. Buchanan
Recently
by Patrick J. Buchanan: Ron
Paul: Reactionary or Visionary
Appearing alongside
CIA Director David Petraeus before the Senate Select Committee on
Intelligence last week, James Clapper, the director of national
intelligence, said of Iran:
"We don't believe
they've actually made the decision to go ahead with a nuclear weapon."
Before the
hearing, as James Fallows of The Atlantic reports, Clapper released
his "Worldwide Threat Assessment." It read, "We do not know ...
if Iran will eventually decide to build nuclear weapons."
Clapper thus
reaffirmed the assessment of 16 U.S. intelligence agencies in 2007,
reportedly repeated in 2011, that the U.S. does not believe that
Iran has decided to become a nuclear weapons state.
In December,
when Defense Secretary Leon Panetta said that if Iran went all out,
it might be able to build a nuclear weapon in a year, Pentagon spokesman
George Little hastily clarified his comments:
"The secretary
was clear that we have no indication that the Iranians have made
a decision to develop a nuclear weapon."
On Jan. 8,
Panetta himself told CBS:
"(Is Iran)
trying to develop a nuclear weapon? No. But we know that they're
trying to develop a nuclear capability. And that's what concerns
us. And our redline to Iran is: Do not develop a nuclear weapon."
On Super Bowl
Sunday, President Barack Obama told NBC's Matt Lauer that he hopes
to solve the Iranian problem "diplomatically."
From the above,
we may conclude that the administration does not believe that Iran
has crossed any redline on the nuclear issue – and President Obama
does not want war with Iran.
Who, then,
does want war? Ayatollah Ali Khamenei? Iranian President Mahmoud
Ahmadinejad?
From their
actions, it would appear not. If Iran wanted war with the United
States, any terror attack inside this country or on U.S. forces
in Iraq or Afghanistan could bring that about in an afternoon.
Expulsion of
the International Atomic Energy Agency inspectors from the Natanz
enrichment facility, covering up the IAEA cameras, breaking the
seals on the low-enriched uranium stockpiled there, or removing
the LEU would be a fire bell for the Pentagon.
But the IAEA
inspectors and LEU are still there.
When the alleged
plot by a used-car salesman in Texas to hire Mexican cartel criminals
to blow up a D.C. restaurant and kill the Saudi ambassador was revealed,
Iran denied it emphatically and demanded to interview the alleged
mastermind.
Moreover, Tehran
has yet to retaliate for the assassinations of five of its nuclear
scientists and four terror attacks by Jundallah in Sistan-Baluchistan
and PJAK, a Kurdish terrorist organization operating out of Iraqi
Kurdistan. Iran has alleged Western and Israeli involvement in these
attacks.
Now that Secretary
of State Hillary Clinton has denied any U.S. involvement, Mossad
is the prime suspect behind the killing of the nuclear scientists.
And U.S. writer Mark Perry, in Foreign Policy, alleges that Mossad
agents posed as CIA and used U.S. dollars in London to recruit Jundallah.
If this is
true, this would be a false flag operation to provoke Iran into
lashing out at America. Apparently, Iran did not take the bait.
Why have the
Iranians not followed through on their threat to close the Strait
of Hormuz and begun to dial it back?
War with the
United States would be a disaster. Though the Tehran regime might
survive – as Saddam Hussein's survived Desert Storm – Iran's navy,
most of its armor, anti-aircraft and anti-ship defenses, and its
strategic missile force would be destroyed, as would much of the
country's infrastructure. Iran would be set back years.
Who, then,
wants war with Iran?
All those who
would like to see exactly that happen to Iran.
And who are
they? The Netanyahu government and its echo chamber in U.S. politics
and media, the neoconservatives, members of Congress, Newt Gingrich
and Rick Santorum.
And as the
Obama administration is the major force in U.S. politics opposed
to war with Iran, its defeat in November would increase, to near
certitude, the probability of a U.S. war with Iran in 2013.
Yet if the
Pentagon and U.S. intelligence community are correct – Iran does
not have a bomb and has not decided to build a bomb – why should
we go to war with Iran?
Answer: Iran
represents "an existential threat" to Israel.
But Israel
has 200 atomic bombs and three ways to deliver them, while Iran
has never built, tested or weaponized a nuclear device. Who is the
existential threat to whom here?
And
though a U.S. war on Iran would be calamitous for Iran, it would
be no cakewalk for Americans, who could become terrorist targets
for years in the Gulf, Afghanistan, Baghdad's Green Zone, Lebanon
and even here in the USA.
Year 2012 is
thus shaping up as a war-or-peace election, with Republicans the
war party and Democrats the peace-and-diplomacy party.
And as the
months pass between now and November, this will become clear to
the nation.
February
8, 2012
Patrick
J. Buchanan [send
him mail] is co-founder and editor of The
American Conservative. He is also the author of seven books,
including Where
the Right Went Wrong, and Churchill,
Hitler, and the Unnecessary War. His latest book is Suicide
of a Superpower: Will America Survive to 2025? See his
website.
Copyright
© 2012 Creators Syndicate
The
Best of Patrick J. Buchanan
|