Mitt
vs. Newt: The Gloves Come Off
by
Patrick
J. Buchanan
Recently
by Patrick J. Buchanan: Who
Wants War With Iran?
Newt Gingrich's
surge to success in South Carolina has surely brought joy to the
Obama White House.
For his 12-point
victory ensures the fight for the GOP nomination will not end soon
and will get nastier. Indeed, it already has. Whether Newt or Mitt
Romney emerges victorious, the candidate who comes out of the Republican
convention will be bruised and bloodied.
Consider, first,
Newt.
According to
a Fox News poll, 56 percent of the American people have an unfavorable
opinion of the former speaker. Only 27 percent hold a favorable
opinion. By two to one, the nation has a negative view of Newt.
And as Newt has been a national figure for two decades, to reverse
the impression he has left on the country would require an immense
volume of positive media, free and bought.
And Newt is
getting neither.
Now, in Florida,
Romney has decided to tear the scab off, and 24 hours after his
South Carolina defeat, he is busy at it.
Newt, said
Mitt, "was a leader for four years as speaker of the House. ...
And at the end of four years ... he was a failed leader, and he
had to resign in disgrace. ... He was investigated (by) an ethics
panel and had to make a payment associated with that, and then ...
88 percent of his (fellow) Republicans voted to reprimand Speaker
Gingrich."
"What's (Newt)
been doing for 15 years?" Mitt asked. "He's been working as a lobbyist
... and selling influence around Washington."
Mitt did not
bring up Newt's three wives and the tawdry tale told by second wife
Marianne to ABC. Yet the super PACs of the Democratic Party will
make sure the women of America know how Newt treated his first two
wives, should he become the nominee.
Yet Mitt has
his own problems, after his worst week in South Carolina.
By going negative
on Newt, he will drive Newt's negatives higher. But attack politics
polarizes a party and drives up the negatives of the attacker, as
well. The Eagle Scout image of Mitt will suffer – both from what
Newt is doing to him and from what he feels he must do to Newt.
Rep. Dick Gephardt
decided he had to take down Howard Dean, who was riding high in
Iowa in 2004. Gephardt ended up taking both of them down. John Kerry
evaded the bloodletting, won the caucuses and cruised to the nomination.
Mitt has suffered,
too, from the malicious portrayal of his days at Bain Capital by
Gingrich and Rick Perry, who portrayed Bain as a vulture sitting
on a tree limb, looking for sick companies to swoop down on, pick
the carcass clean and leave a skeleton.
Romney's revelations
last week that he pays only 15 percent of his income in federal
taxes, that he has investments in the Caymans, that the $375,000
he earned in speaking fees did not amount to much and that he enjoys
firing people – even if it was insurance companies – all feed into
the caricature of a country-club Republican with nothing in common
with people who live from paycheck to paycheck.
Wealth is not
necessarily an impediment to political success. FDR, a Hudson Valley
aristocrat, and JFK were men of wealth who did less to earn their
money than Mitt did to earn his. But they carried it more easily.
When JFK was
being attacked because his father, who amassed his pile in stocks
and liquor, had poured huge sums into the West Virginia primary
on his son's behalf, Sen. Kennedy joked about it, telling the Gridiron
Club that his father had sent him a telegram just before the primary:
"Don't buy a single vote more than is necessary. I'll be damned
if I'll pay for a landslide."
It is hard
to recall a primary season that got this ugly this early. Words
like dishonest, liar and corrupt, and phrases like serial hypocrite
have come not just from independent and unaccountable super PACs
but from the paid media of the campaigns and the candidates themselves.
The primary
season that much resembles this one is 1964. Then, Gov. Nelson Rockefeller,
icon of the Eastern liberal establishment that had imposed nominees
Wendell Willkie, Tom Dewey (twice) and Dwight Eisenhower on the
party, lost the California primary and the nomination to Barry Goldwater.
Speaking
to that divided convention, Rockefeller was booed and jeered from
the balconies when he called on the delegates to condemn the John
Birch Society equally with the Ku Klux Klan and Communist Party.
The party never
came together that fall. Goldwater suffered a defeat unequaled since
Alf Landon carried two states in 1936. The ideological divide between
Romney and Newt is not nearly so great as that between Goldwater
and Rockefeller, but the personal animosity is certainly approaching
that.
With the Tea
Party recoiling from Romney and rallying to Newt, and regular Republicans
coalescing around Mitt, with dozens of primaries and caucuses ahead,
Tampa just might end up looking like the Cow Palace in '64.
January
25, 2012
Patrick
J. Buchanan [send
him mail] is co-founder and editor of The
American Conservative. He is also the author of seven books,
including Where
the Right Went Wrong, and Churchill,
Hitler, and the Unnecessary War. His latest book is Suicide
of a Superpower: Will America Survive to 2025? See his
website.
Copyright
© 2012 Creators Syndicate
The
Best of Patrick J. Buchanan
|